LAW NOTES:* K. Selvaraj, MHC Adv, *Judicial Review of Ordinance (Continued)* (3) If it is not laid before the Legislature, which is mandatory, it is a fraud on

[2/22, 22:48] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *23.02.2021, LAW NOTES:*
K. Selvaraj, MHC Adv,

*Judicial Review of Ordinance (Continued)*

(3) If it is not laid before the Legislature, which is mandatory, it is a fraud on Constitution and it cannot have the same force and effect as a Law enacted.

[(2017) 3 SCC 1]
Krishna Kumar Singh Vs. St. of Bihar

(4) If the satisfaction of the President or the Governor constitutes a fraud on power or was acctuated by oblique motive and it is based on extraneous grounds. In other words there was no satisfaction at all. The satisfaction does not however mean the personal satisfaction of the Governor, but that of his Council of Ministers on whose advice he has to act as a Constitutional head.

1. [(1994) 3 SCC 1]
S. R. Bommai Vs. UOI

2. [(1982) 1 SCC 271]
A. K. Roy Vs. UOI

3. [(1974) 2 SCC 831]
Samsher Singh Vs. St. of Punjab

*To be continued*
[2/23, 06:38] Sekarreporter1: ☘️