Follow:
- Next story Facilitating late-filing of Income Tax returns is service: Madras HC upholds Section 234 (F) of IT Act prescribing Fee for default in timely filing of returns Chief Justice AP Sahi and Subramonium Prasad, however, disagreed. Rather, the Court found merit in the arguments advanced by the State authorities that the “service” involved is facility allowing late-payers to file their income returns beyond the prescribed date. As stated in the judgmentAdvocate S Santhosh appeared for the petitioner. Additional Solicitor General G Rajagopalan appeared for the Union of India and Advocate Hema Muralikrishnan appeared for the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
- Previous story W.P.No.2816 of 2020 and W.M.P.No.3260 of 2020 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and R.PONGIAPPAN, J. (Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.) 8.This Court is of the view that this case is only the tip of the iceberg. There are many Government properties and poramboke lands being knocked away by private parties viz., land grabbers by using political influence, money power, muscle power and in collusion with the Government officials. The value of the lands have now gone up and therefore, the lands have to be preserved for public purposes. Otherwise, the land grabbers will swallow the properties and unjustly enrich themselves. Therefore, this Court, Suo Motu impleads,
Recent Posts
- In this regard, the Secretary to Government made a submission that all actions for effective administration will be completed within a period of 15 days and thereafter, further actions will be initiated for the purpose of completing works relating to Kalaimagal Sabha. In this regard, therespondents are directed to file a status report on 04th June, 2024.Page 1 of 2https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judisS.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.Jeni
- In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the followingterms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights andResponsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act(Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declaredto be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590,26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)23.04.2024Index : YesSpeaking orderNeutral Citation : YesJerTo
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner
More
Recent Posts
- In this regard, the Secretary to Government made a submission that all actions for effective administration will be completed within a period of 15 days and thereafter, further actions will be initiated for the purpose of completing works relating to Kalaimagal Sabha. In this regard, therespondents are directed to file a status report on 04th June, 2024.Page 1 of 2https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judisS.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.Jeni
- In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the followingterms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights andResponsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act(Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declaredto be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590,26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)23.04.2024Index : YesSpeaking orderNeutral Citation : YesJerTo
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner