*k selvaraj law notes 29.3.’21, LAW NOTES :* *RELATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT ENTRIES IN THE SAME LIST* *(1)* Every attempt should be made to harmonize the different entries in the same list and to discard a construction which will render any of the entries nugatory or ineffective. [AIR 1962 SC 1044] Calcutta Gas Co. Vs. St. of W.B. *(2)* As between entries in the same list, the general scheme followed is that each particular entry should relate to a separate subject or group of cognate subjects. But the different entries are supplemenntary to each other. [AIR 1961 SC 1170] J.K Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Vs. St. of U.P.
*k selvaraj law notes 29.3.’21, LAW NOTES :*
*RELATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT ENTRIES IN THE SAME LIST*
*(1)* Every attempt should be made to harmonize the different entries in the same list and to discard a construction which will render any of the entries nugatory or ineffective.
[AIR 1962 SC 1044]
Calcutta Gas Co. Vs. St. of W.B.
*(2)* As between entries in the same list, the general scheme followed is that each particular entry should relate to a separate subject or group of cognate subjects. But the different entries are supplemenntary to each other.
[AIR 1961 SC 1170]
J.K Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Vs. St. of U.P.
