You may also like...
-
The First Division Bench of Chief Justice S.V. Gangapurwala and Justice P.D. Audikesavalu wanted Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran to place before the court, any judgement that could be relied upon by Tasmac to seek the benefit of Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act. Since Mr. Ravindran sought some time for this, the judges adjourned, by two weeks, a writ appeal preferred by the Tasmac MD
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 20, 2023
-
Justices S Vaidyanathan & Mohammed Shaffiq of Madras HC set aside a 2008 Health dept order terminating a Mazdoor employed on compassionate grounds in 1986. He was accused of suppressing his brother’s job. Orders terminal benefits to his family since he died in 2014. Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Writ Appeal No.678 of 2021 The Deputy Director of Public Health For Appellant : Mr.U.M.Ravichandran, Special Government Pleader For Respondents : Mr.B.Balachander
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 5, 2022
-
Nirbhaya case: Centre, Delhi government move Supreme Court against High Court verdict on hanging of convicts:
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 5, 2020