You may also like...
-
Tenant case s vaithiyanathan judge full orderRegistry is directed to send a copy of this order to MHAA, MBA and Women Lawyers’ Association to inform the members of the respective Associations that they should not defend a dishonest Tenant, who happens to be a deceitful Advocate, like the petitioner herein, who is not a gentleman, in order to safeguard the reputation of this profession. An Advocate, who happens to be a tenant, should be a gentleman and shall vacate the premises within 30 days, if request is made by the landlord. If that happens, a Lawyer will get a house on rent even without a written agreement. Some of the Advocates are now-a-days looked at as Rowdies and third rate criminals by public by the conduct of similar to the one of the tenant in this case. It is painful to say that many of the Advocates are involved in the land grabbing and if the antecedent of the petitioner / S.VAIDYANATHAN,J., jrs/ar tenant is verified, he may also be one of the land grabbers. The tenant has scant regard for the orders of the Court and he has portrayed sadistic attitude. With the above observations and directions, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands closed. 03.02.2021
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 30, 2021
-
Sc upheld the order HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN Suo Motu Crl. Contempt Petition No.866 of 2021 The Registrar General High Court, Madras 1 P.R. Adikesavan vs. Petitioner 2 Balasubramanian Respondents Suo Motu Criminal Contempt proceedings initiated against the respondents as per order 14.07.2021 passed in I.P. No.16 of 2008. For petitioner Mr. M. Santhanaraman R1 Party-in-person R2 Party-in-person – – – – – – ORDER P.N.PRAKASH, J. This suo motu criminal contempt proceedings is initiated against the respondents as per order 14.07.2021 passed in I.P. No.16 of 2008.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 24, 2022
-
Today news video in www.sekarreporter.com
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 9, 2020