Follow:
- Next story Madras HC comes to rescue of widow who was denied home loan insurance claim Bench of Chief Justice Amreshwar Pratap Sahi and Justice Subramonium Prasad dismissed a writ appeal preferred by HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company and confirmed an order passed by Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana on June 6 directing the company to honour the claim.
- Previous story Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana acceded to the request made by senior counsel R. Thyagarajan and G. Masilamani on behalf of Mr. Chidambaram, and urged all parties to cooperate for the early disposal of the election petition, since it had been pending in the court for over a decade.
Recent Posts
- Hrnc vollege appintment mhc order
- Pursuant to a recent Madras High Court observation that medical courses in India continue to reaffirm queer-phobia and the urgent need to revamp the existing curriculum in this regard, the National Medical Commission (NMC) last week issued an advisory directing all medical institutions to refrain from approving textbooks that contain ‘unscientific, derogatory and discriminatory information’ about the LGBTQIA+ community
- SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ( Before : R. Subhash Reddy and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. ) NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant
- Temple land order WP No.21323 of 2021 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J. (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice) The grievance of the petitioner is that a substantial part of the land belonging to Arulmighu Trisoolanathar temple has been taken over by the encroachers and the respondent authorities have not taken any meaningful steps to recover the land. 2. According to the State, represented by learned Government Pleader Mr.P.Muthukumar, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3, about 83.26 acre of land belonging to the relevant temple is in possession of third parties. It is the further submission of Mr.P.Muthukumar that the land measuring approximately 21 acre has been let out and the rent in respect thereof is being received by the Executive Officer appointed over the relevant temple. As to the balance approximately 62 acre, it is submitted that there is encroachment and action was initiated against the encroachers since they had purported to rely on forged and fabricated documents. However, it does not appear that the encroachers have been removed. 3. The first respondent should file a report when the matter appears next, six weeks hence, as to the action taken to remove the encroachers. The report should also indicate how and in what circumstances, a part of the land belonging to the temple may have been let out to a third party. The District Collector should render all cooperation together with the revenue officials under him for the purpose of measuring the land and enabling an appropriate report to be filed. List on 29.11.2021. (S.B., CJ.) (P.D.A.,J.) 04.10.2021 bbr THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J. bbr WP No.21323 of 2021 04.10.2021
- Explained| Sections 138 and 141 of NI Act: Vicarious liability of directors of a company for dishonour of cheques
More
Recent Posts
- Hrnc vollege appintment mhc order
- Pursuant to a recent Madras High Court observation that medical courses in India continue to reaffirm queer-phobia and the urgent need to revamp the existing curriculum in this regard, the National Medical Commission (NMC) last week issued an advisory directing all medical institutions to refrain from approving textbooks that contain ‘unscientific, derogatory and discriminatory information’ about the LGBTQIA+ community
- SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ( Before : R. Subhash Reddy and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. ) NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant
- Temple land order WP No.21323 of 2021 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J. (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice) The grievance of the petitioner is that a substantial part of the land belonging to Arulmighu Trisoolanathar temple has been taken over by the encroachers and the respondent authorities have not taken any meaningful steps to recover the land. 2. According to the State, represented by learned Government Pleader Mr.P.Muthukumar, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3, about 83.26 acre of land belonging to the relevant temple is in possession of third parties. It is the further submission of Mr.P.Muthukumar that the land measuring approximately 21 acre has been let out and the rent in respect thereof is being received by the Executive Officer appointed over the relevant temple. As to the balance approximately 62 acre, it is submitted that there is encroachment and action was initiated against the encroachers since they had purported to rely on forged and fabricated documents. However, it does not appear that the encroachers have been removed. 3. The first respondent should file a report when the matter appears next, six weeks hence, as to the action taken to remove the encroachers. The report should also indicate how and in what circumstances, a part of the land belonging to the temple may have been let out to a third party. The District Collector should render all cooperation together with the revenue officials under him for the purpose of measuring the land and enabling an appropriate report to be filed. List on 29.11.2021. (S.B., CJ.) (P.D.A.,J.) 04.10.2021 bbr THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J. bbr WP No.21323 of 2021 04.10.2021
- Explained| Sections 138 and 141 of NI Act: Vicarious liability of directors of a company for dishonour of cheques
