judges said that the police had failed to obtain CCTV footage from the ATMs and hence it would be difficult to accept the theory of the police, especially when it was their own case that the prime accused was an agriculturist and also the owner of a tourist cab. As far as the five assailants were concerned, the judges concluded that they were guilty because of their fatal overt acts. [6/23, 08:58] Sekarreporter 1: RT.No.3/2017 & Crl.A.Nos.162 to 165 & 183/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on: 18.03.2020 Delivered on: 22.06.2020 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Referred Trial No.3 of 2017 and Crl.A.Nos.162 to 165 of 2018 and 183 of 2018 Crl.A.Nos.162 to 165 of 2018

You may also like...