Judge v parthiban j .In the result, both the Second Appeals stand dismissed. The Substantial Questions of Law framed in both the Second Appeals are answered against the appellants. The appellants herein are directed to handover the vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the respondent Charity within two months

[2/24, 11:52] Sekarreporter: 30.In the result, both the Second Appeals stand
dismissed. The Substantial Questions of Law framed in both the
Second Appeals are answered against the appellants. The appellants
herein are directed to handover the vacant possession of the suit
schedule property to the respondent Charity within two months
[2/24, 11:54] Sekarreporter: S.A.No.42 & 43 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON: 12.02.2020
PRONOUNCED ON: 21.02.2020
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
S.A. Nos.42 and 43 of 2008
and
M.P. Nos.1 and 1 of 2008
and
MP No.1 and 1 of 2012
Chandra
Ravichandran
Janakiraman
Kumar
Selvi Sumathi
Selvi Vimala …Appellants in
both S.As.
Vs.
Sri Kakumani Adikesavalu Chetty Charities
Rep. by its Managing Trustees
Residing at No.15 and 16 Perumal Koil
North Mada Street,
Villivakkam,
Madras – 49.
By 1. Ananda Krishnan
N. Nammalvarchetty
Nathella Adikesavalu Gupta
P. Niranjan
C.N.Badrinath
K.Subbarayalu
K.Rajendran … Respondents in
S.A. No.42 of 2008
1/34

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME