Judge v parthiban j .In the result, both the Second Appeals stand dismissed. The Substantial Questions of Law framed in both the Second Appeals are answered against the appellants. The appellants herein are directed to handover the vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the respondent Charity within two months
by
Sekar Reporter
·
February 24, 2020
[2/24, 11:52] Sekarreporter: 30.In the result, both the Second Appeals stand dismissed. The Substantial Questions of Law framed in both the Second Appeals are answered against the appellants. The appellants herein are directed to handover the vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the respondent Charity within two months [2/24, 11:54] Sekarreporter: S.A.No.42 & 43 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON: 12.02.2020 PRONOUNCED ON: 21.02.2020 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN S.A. Nos.42 and 43 of 2008 and M.P. Nos.1 and 1 of 2008 and MP No.1 and 1 of 2012 Chandra Ravichandran Janakiraman Kumar Selvi Sumathi Selvi Vimala …Appellants in both S.As. Vs. Sri Kakumani Adikesavalu Chetty Charities Rep. by its Managing Trustees Residing at No.15 and 16 Perumal Koil North Mada Street, Villivakkam, Madras – 49. By 1. Ananda Krishnan N. Nammalvarchetty Nathella Adikesavalu Gupta P. Niranjan C.N.Badrinath K.Subbarayalu K.Rajendran … Respondents in S.A. No.42 of 2008 1/34