You may also like...
-
Full order of THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W. P.No.15246 of 2018and W.M.P.Nos.18074 of 2018 & 6417 of 2021 (Through Video Conferencing) Dr.K.Thamizharasan … Petitioner Vs.—-For Petitioner — During the interregnum, the fifth respondent shall continue to be the Principal in-charge of the fourth respondent college till the above exercise is carried out and shall refrain from taking any important policy, administrative and financial decision of the fourth respondent college. xi. No cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 15.11.2021 : M/s.Arulmozhi For R1, R6 & R7 : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, Govt. Adv. For R2 : Mr.P.R.Gopinathan For R3 & R4 : Mr.B.Ravi For R5 : Mrs.Hema Sampath, Senior Counsel for M/s.S.Nandhini Devi. For R8 : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram O R D E R
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 17, 2021
-
Gambling with stakes not illegal: Madras HC https://t.co/nQLr00ATuY via @timesofindia
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 23, 2019
-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.Nos.14782 and 19961 of 2020—Last but not the least, the Government shall also regularize the services of the Contract Labourers on par with these petitioners, who have been working in Public Works Department and also those, who have been deputed by PWD to Madras High Court and Madurai Bench of Madras High Court both Civil and Electrical, other Departments, etc., for more than 10 years and consider to bring them on regular employment under Class-IV, as their condition is worse than the petitioners herein and their future is more questionable. The Government must ensure that there is no economic death due to unemployment and a sword of Damocles, viz., disengagement cannot be allowed to be hung on these petitioners / similarly placed persons. Where a work is perennial in nature, the employees should be engaged directly. In view of that, when the Contractor is changing and the work is also perennial in nature in this case, it
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 24, 2021