![[9/10, 06:49] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1700680249410031778?t=RDea75vMnbyK0g3-OLm_zA&s=08 [9/10, 06:49] sekarreporter1: 32.Consequently, applying the Law discussed above to the facts of the present case, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The FIR having been registered, in this case, within two days from the date of the accident on 13.10.2022 by Oragadam Police Station, the petition filed in M.A.C.T.O.P.(SR).No.3280 of 2023 has to only be treated as a reminder to the Court to call for the FIR and other reports and register the same as a Claim Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The Order passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal is set aside and a direction shall be issued to treat the application filed on 19.04.2023 as a reminder to the Court for a plea of just compensation under 166(4) and take up the application for trial. No Costs. 18.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No mps To The Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J, mps Pre-Delivery Order in C.R.P.No.2558 of 2023 18.08.2023 https://sekarreporter.com/32-consequently-applying-the-law-discussed-above-to-the-facts-of-the-present-case-this-civil-revision-petition-is-allowed-the-fir-having-been-registered-in-this-case-within-two-days-from-the-date/](http://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Case against dmk raja news admk thirumaran interview videp
- Previous story Saithapatai court Case against vanitha puthiyatha thalaimurai tv news
Recent Posts
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary
- Today 5 law tips/ Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )
- SPEECH OF THIRU P.WILSON MP ON EMPOWERMENT OF SC-ST- OBC AT JAWAHAR BHAWAN ON 24.4.2024.
- The Madras University Vice Chancellor Appointment matter filed by B. Jagannath- came up today for Hearing on 23.04.2024 before the Learned First Bench.
- Judge velmurugan order . (31)Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed with an exemplarycost of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Only] payable to the 1st respondent / plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today. The application for appointment
More
Recent Posts
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary
- Today 5 law tips/ Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )
- SPEECH OF THIRU P.WILSON MP ON EMPOWERMENT OF SC-ST- OBC AT JAWAHAR BHAWAN ON 24.4.2024.
- The Madras University Vice Chancellor Appointment matter filed by B. Jagannath- came up today for Hearing on 23.04.2024 before the Learned First Bench.
- Judge velmurugan order . (31)Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed with an exemplarycost of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Only] payable to the 1st respondent / plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today. The application for appointment