Skip to content

Primary Menu

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Search for:

Home
Uncategorized
Idol case SC advt g s Mani interview

Uncategorized

Idol case SC advt g s Mani interview

By Sekar Reporter 11 months ago

Continue Reading

Previous State orders Idol Wing Special Officer to hand over all records A.G. Pon Manickavel

Next Idol case IG ponmanikavel reply to govt

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Search for:

Recent Posts

CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* *online webinar* for JUDICIAL EXAMS Date :31/10/2020 Timing: 11am to 1pm Subject: overview of all subjects
JUSTICE V. PARTHIBAN W.P.No.12495 of 2020 & W.M.P.Nos.15407, 15408 & 15409 ofIn the conspectus of the above discussion, this court is compelled to come to a conclusion that there has been wholesale violation of the rules and the procedure, as the 1st respondent
Justices N. Kirubakaran and B. Pugalendhi appointed advocate P. Ganapathi Subramanian as the advocate commissioner in the case. The court directed him to inspect the region and file a report after it was alleged that in the name of taking excess sand from a patta land nearby, sand was being excavated from Kottakarai river to a depth of five to ten feet.
Justices M Sathyanarayanan and R Hemalatha passed the directions on a plea moved by M Logarangan seeking action against delivery boys who were charging more than the billed amount.
The Madras High Court has slammed BSNL for refusing a compassionate-ground appointment for a deserving candidate, saying that it was its responsibility and not temple “prasad” or an act of charity.

Recent Posts

CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* *online webinar* for JUDICIAL EXAMS Date :31/10/2020 Timing: 11am to 1pm Subject: overview of all subjects
JUSTICE V. PARTHIBAN W.P.No.12495 of 2020 & W.M.P.Nos.15407, 15408 & 15409 ofIn the conspectus of the above discussion, this court is compelled to come to a conclusion that there has been wholesale violation of the rules and the procedure, as the 1st respondent
Justices N. Kirubakaran and B. Pugalendhi appointed advocate P. Ganapathi Subramanian as the advocate commissioner in the case. The court directed him to inspect the region and file a report after it was alleged that in the name of taking excess sand from a patta land nearby, sand was being excavated from Kottakarai river to a depth of five to ten feet.
Justices M Sathyanarayanan and R Hemalatha passed the directions on a plea moved by M Logarangan seeking action against delivery boys who were charging more than the billed amount.
The Madras High Court has slammed BSNL for refusing a compassionate-ground appointment for a deserving candidate, saying that it was its responsibility and not temple “prasad” or an act of charity.

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Magazine 7 by AF themes.

CALL ME