Follow:
- Next story Isha Foundation only promoting govt.’s Krishi Aranya Protsaha Yojane of 2011 by mobilising farmers: State The High Court of Karnataka on Tuesday asked Sadguru Jaggi Vasudev’s Isha Foundation to spell out the amount collected so far for their ‘Cauvery Calling’ project, besides questioning whether the foundation was authorised to collect funds for the project. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice Hemant Chandangoudar directed the foundation to file its additional statements as the earlier statement filed did not contain details like the manner of fund collection and whether the contribution towards Cauvery Calling was voluntary or not. As the statement filed by the foundation did not contain the name of the ‘authorised signatory’, the Bench said that law mandates disclosure of details of persons filling statements before the court and orally observed that “even spiritual organisations are bound by law”.
- Previous story TAMIL NADUVedanta made at least ₹20,000 cr. in 20 years: TNPCB
Recent Posts
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary
- Today 5 law tips/ Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )
- SPEECH OF THIRU P.WILSON MP ON EMPOWERMENT OF SC-ST- OBC AT JAWAHAR BHAWAN ON 24.4.2024.
- The Madras University Vice Chancellor Appointment matter filed by B. Jagannath- came up today for Hearing on 23.04.2024 before the Learned First Bench.
- Judge velmurugan order . (31)Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed with an exemplarycost of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Only] payable to the 1st respondent / plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today. The application for appointment
More
Recent Posts
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary
- Today 5 law tips/ Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )
- SPEECH OF THIRU P.WILSON MP ON EMPOWERMENT OF SC-ST- OBC AT JAWAHAR BHAWAN ON 24.4.2024.
- The Madras University Vice Chancellor Appointment matter filed by B. Jagannath- came up today for Hearing on 23.04.2024 before the Learned First Bench.
- Judge velmurugan order . (31)Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed with an exemplarycost of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Only] payable to the 1st respondent / plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today. The application for appointment