Fake reporter case full order by (N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.) 05.02.2020 by Sekar Reporter · February 5, 2020 [2/5, 18:43] Sekarreporter 1: W.P.Nos.32091 & 31647 of 2019 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and P.VELMURUGAN, J. (Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.) It is submitted by Mr.E.Manoharan, learned Special Government Pleader that dailies and periodicals are registered with ‘The Registrar of Newspapers for India’ and no registration is required with the State Government. Therefore, “The Registrar of Newspapers for India, 9th Floor, Soochna Bhawan, Lodhi Road, CGO Complex, New Delhi, Delhi 110003″ and “Union of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Room No.552, A Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110001″ are Suo motu, implead as respondents 12 and 13 in the proceedings. 2.Mr.G.Karthikeyan, learned Assistant Solicitor General takes notice on behalf of the newly impleaded respondents 12, 13 and 6th respondent. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.A.P.Surya Prakasam for 11th respondent and print the name of tenth respondent viz., “Audit Bureau of Circulations (India), 4th Floor, Wakefiled House, SS Ram Gulam Marg, Ballard Estate, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India” in the cause list. 3.Mr.A.P.Suryaprakasam, learned Counsel for the 11th respondent would submit that Dr.B.J.Thanika who claims to be the State Secretary of Tamil Nadu Press and Media Reporters Union intends to implead himself as party to the proceedings to assist the Court which would enable this Court to give appropriate directions. Hence, “Dr.B.J.Thanika, having office at 72/41, [2/5, 18:43] Sekarreporter 1: Mosque Street, Saidapet, Chennai 600015″ is suo motu impleaded as 14th respondent. 4.It is evident from the typed set of papers filed by newly impleaded respondents 15 to 19 that fake press identity cards have been issued in the name of ‘All India Anti Corruption Press, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India’. The learned Special Government Pleader would submit that even after search, they could not find any such body in the said name. This Court is of the view that search is not necessary as the name itself proves that it is a fake press body. It is seen that about 100 press identity cards have been issued under the said name. Hence, the learned Public Prosecutor is to ask the police to investigate and find out the persons who are holding such identity cards and take criminal action if they are found to be misusing the name of Government of India under the relevant act. 5.Today, an affidavit has been filed by the fourth respondent and the same is taken on file. Likewise, an affidavit has been filed by the fifth respondent/Government stating that there are 226 Journalists Associations registered in Tamil Nadu and an additional status report has been filed by the first respondent stating that there are 204 cases registered against the journalists throughout the State. 6.All the served respondents are directed to file their counter and the details sought for on the next hearing. Post the matter on 12.02.2020. (N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.) 05.02.2020
திமுக சின்னத்தில் வெற்றி பெற்ற கூட்டணி கட்சி எம்.எல்.ஏ.-க்களை எப்படி அமரவைக்க வேண்டுமென்பது சபாநாயகரின் அதிகாரத்திற்கு உட்பட்டதால், அந்த லட்சுமண ரேகையை தண்ட முடியாது என கூறியுள்ள சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம், அதுதொடர்பான வழக்கை தள்ளுபடி செய்துள்ளது. September 3, 2021 by Sekar Reporter · Published September 3, 2021
திமுக சின்னத்தில் வெற்றி பெற்ற கூட்டணி கட்சி எம்.எல்.ஏ.க்கள் எட்டு பேரை எதிர்கட்சி உறுப்பினர்களாக கருதக் கூடாதென சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் மனுத்தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது. August 31, 2021 by Sekar Reporter · Published August 31, 2021
Full order of CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU WP No.23102 of 2021 and WMP No.24345 of 2021 Naseembee .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The State Election Commissioner, Tamilnadu State Election Commission, directing the video footage to be preserved for a period of 60 days beginning October 13, 2021, subject to the order for further extension that may be passed by any appropriate authority. It will also be open to the relevant courts in receipt of a complaint pertaining to any malpractice in course of the election to any constituency, to immediately call for the video footage so that the same may be preserved notwithstanding the general rule for destroying the same after 45 days from the announcement of the results. October 31, 2021 by Sekar Reporter · Published October 31, 2021