Eight Dj elevation case SC full order by Sekar Reporter · December 13, 2019 Skip to contentsekarreporter.com 9445430817MENUEight Dj elevation case SC full order ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1172/2019 R. POORNIMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date :06-12-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, Adv. Mr. Abhay Singh, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR Ms. Manisha Pandey, Adv. Ms. Ankita Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Kunal Mallick, Adv. Mr. Aditya Rajeshwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, prayer ‘A’ is allowed to be deleted. Issue notice restricted to the question of the entitlement of the petitioners to be considered by virtue of having put in 18 years, as claimed. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. [ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL ] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRARITEM NO.25 COURT NO.1 SECTION XS U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I ARECORD OF PROCEEDINGSWrit Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1172/2019R. POORNIMA & ORS. Petitioner(s)VERSUSUNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)(FOR ADMISSION)Date :06-12-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM :HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAIHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANTFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, Adv.Mr. Abhay Singh, Adv.Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AORMs. Manisha Pandey, Adv.Ms. Ankita Agarwal, Adv.Mr. Kunal Mallick, Adv.Mr. Aditya Rajeshwar, Adv.For Respondent(s)UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingO R D E RAt the request of Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learnedsenior counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioners, prayer ‘A’ is allowed to be deleted.Issue notice restricted to the question of theentitlement of the petitioners to be considered byvirtue of having put in 18 years, as claimed.Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.[ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL ]A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRARAuthor: sekarreporter9445430817 View all posts by sekarreporterAuthor sekarreporterPosted onDecember 13, 2019CategoriesUncategorizedLeave a ReplyLogged in as sekarreporter. Log out?COMMENT Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email.Post navigationPREVIOUSPrevious post:Watch “ஐஐடி மாணவி வழக்கு – சிபிஐ விசாரணை கோரிய மனு தள்ளுபடி” on YouTubeRECENT POSTSEight Dj elevation case SC full order ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1172/2019 R. POORNIMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date :06-12-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, Adv. Mr. Abhay Singh, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR Ms. Manisha Pandey, Adv. Ms. Ankita Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Kunal Mallick, Adv. Mr. Aditya Rajeshwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, prayer ‘A’ is allowed to be deleted. Issue notice restricted to the question of the entitlement of the petitioners to be considered by virtue of having put in 18 years, as claimed. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. [ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL ] A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRARDecember 13, 2019Watch “ஐஐடி மாணவி வழக்கு – சிபிஐ விசாரணை கோரிய மனு தள்ளுபடி” on YouTubeDecember 13, 2019Eight district judges move SC to get elevated as HC judgesDecember 13, 2019Madras HC dismisses PIL petition filed by National Students Union of India seeking CBI investigation in the death of IIT student Fathima Lateef. [12/13, 11:18] Sekarreporter: Court directs IIT management to provide psychological counselling to the students.December 13, 2019Holding that a demand of Rs 50,000 for buying household articles for establishing a separate family cannot be construed as a demand of dowry, the Madras High Court has quashed the orders of a lower court (Mahalir Nedhimandram) in the city. Accepting the arguments of senior advocate K Doraisamy, Justice P N Prakash ordered the acquittal of Sakthi, the husband, Muthuraj and Neela (parents-in-law) of the deceased Kalpana, recently.December 13, 2019TEXT WIDGETThis is a text widget. The Text Widget allows you to add text or HTML to your sidebar. You can use a text widget to display text, links, images, HTML, or a combination of these. Edit them in the Widget section of the Customizer.Search for:SEARCHHomeAboutContactTwitterFacebookGoogle+GitHubWordPress.comsekarreporter.com 9445430817 Blog at WordPress.com.
[4/23, 12:03] V subramani Advt: Very honest..straight forward..hard working..dedicated….justice Manikumar known for his elaborate judgements covering entire spectrum of issues involved with succinct and minute details ..Very good of mine in those days of his practice in Madras High court ….Unfortunate..He doesn’t have opportunity ..though very much deserve in all respects with all India seniority …to adorn the bench of Apex court…Wishing him very happy..peaceful..healthy retired life 💐💐 [4/23, 12:16] sekarreporter1: 🌹🌹 April 23, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published April 23, 2023
bail cancelled senthil balaji incom tax dept appeal full order HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.OP(MD)Nos. 11106, 11108, 11110, 11111, 11112 and 11115 of 2023 (1)Crl.OP(MD)No.11106 of 2023:- Smt.S.N.Yogapriyangaa : Petitioner/De-facto. For Petitioner : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan Additional Solicitor General of India for Mr.N.Dilip Kumar Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department For 1st Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 to R5 : Mr.N.R.Elango Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Palani Raja. Additional Solicitor General ARL Sundaresan and Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department N Dilip Kumar appeared for the IT officials. Additional Public Prosecutor B Nambiselvan appeared for the respondent- police. Senior Counsel NR Elango and advocate M Palani Raj appeared for some private individuals, who were also respondent parties in the case. July 30, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published July 30, 2023
498(A) IPC by the trial Court. Hence, the conviction of sentence of the petitioner for offence under Section 498(A) IPC is confirmed. Considering the age of the appellant who is now 80 years of age, this Court is inclined to modify the sentence of imprisonment June 9, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published June 9, 2020