DMK moves contempt plea against Natiional Medical Commission secretary Senior advocate P Wilson, arguing for the DMK, made a mention before the first bench of Sanjib Banerjee and Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy to move the contempt plea against RK Vats. Published: 04th February 2021 05:52 AM | Last Updated: 04th February 2021 05:52 AM | A+A A- Madras High Court Madras High Court (File photo | EPS) By Express News Service

ADVERTISEMENT

SUBSCRIBE E-PAPER
STOCK MARKET BSE NSE
Home States Tamil Nadu
DMK moves contempt plea against Natiional Medical Commission secretary
Senior advocate P Wilson, arguing for the DMK, made a mention before the first bench of Sanjib Banerjee and Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy to move the contempt plea against RK Vats.

Published: 04th February 2021 05:52 AM | Last Updated: 04th February 2021 05:52 AM | A+A A-
Madras High Court Madras High Court (File photo | EPS) By Express News Service
CHENNAI: The DMK on Wednesday moved a contempt plea against National Medical Commission Secretary, RK Vats, for violating the Madras High Court order on implementation of 69 per cent reservation in the seats surrendered by the State for medical and dental courses. The High Court had also directed the implementation of 50 per cent reservation for OBC students from academic year 2021-22.

Senior advocate P Wilson, arguing for the DMK, made a mention before the first bench of Sanjib Banerjee and Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy to move the contempt plea against RK Vats. “The Supreme Court, entertaining an appeal by the State government against a July 27 order, refused to stay the High Court order and directed implementation of All India Quota reservation in medical and dental courses for the academic year 2021-22,” Wilson said.

According to the petition filed by DMK’s TKS Elangovan, “The High Court had ordered the Centre to constitute a committee with the participation of Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Tamil Nadu Health Department and the Medical Council of India, to provide reservation for OBC students in institutions not under the Central government.”

Advertisement

The petition also contended that the formation of the committee with present members was in violation of the High Court order. No reply was received for a contempt order moved against the members concerned in November, the petition added.

You may also like...