Follow:
- Next story G Mohanakrishnan, the President of MHAA said, “Advocates will boycott today courts in the city ” He pointed out that the February 19 case, which was investigated by the CBI is still pending before the courts. “The cases have to be expedited,” he said.
- Previous story The Supreme Court has observed that the High Courts should continuously recommend names for judicial appointments in anticipation of vacancies, regardless of the pendency of the earlier recommendations.
Recent Posts
- [28/03, 14:22] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773271895485317200?t=MsfEAHmgmHmp4lev5b-VaA&s=08[28/03, 14:23] sekarreporter1: Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2024 inCrl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.The present petition has been filed by a victimized complainant seeking cancellation of bail granted by this court in Crl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023 to the second respondent herein in respect of offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 448, 420, 506(2) IPC in Crime No.426 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent herein, contending that the second respondent herein had misrepresented this court for getting the bail and he had not fulfilled the condition imposed by this court while granting the bail.
- Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira said, crimes of such nature were on the increase in and around Chennai due to lack of awareness among the people and therefore, it was incumbent upon the State to warn them by publicising the modus operandi adopted by the fradusters.
- Today, the Writ Appeals filed by the State challenging an order of the High Court quashing G.O. 721 which was issued by the AIADMK government to hand over files of the Regupathy Commission of Inquiry to the DVAC were permitted to be withdrawn by a Hon’ble Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kumaresh Babu.
- 28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2004 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 855 SC : maulavi hussain haji abraham.umarji vs state of gujarat : while interpreting a provision the court only interprets the law and cannot legislate it
- உதவி ஆணையராக இருந்த வெள்ளதுரை உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு மாநில மனித உரிமை ஆணையம் அபராதம் விதித்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை ரத்து
More
Recent Posts
- [28/03, 14:22] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773271895485317200?t=MsfEAHmgmHmp4lev5b-VaA&s=08[28/03, 14:23] sekarreporter1: Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2024 inCrl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.The present petition has been filed by a victimized complainant seeking cancellation of bail granted by this court in Crl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023 to the second respondent herein in respect of offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 448, 420, 506(2) IPC in Crime No.426 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent herein, contending that the second respondent herein had misrepresented this court for getting the bail and he had not fulfilled the condition imposed by this court while granting the bail.
- Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira said, crimes of such nature were on the increase in and around Chennai due to lack of awareness among the people and therefore, it was incumbent upon the State to warn them by publicising the modus operandi adopted by the fradusters.
- Today, the Writ Appeals filed by the State challenging an order of the High Court quashing G.O. 721 which was issued by the AIADMK government to hand over files of the Regupathy Commission of Inquiry to the DVAC were permitted to be withdrawn by a Hon’ble Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kumaresh Babu.
- 28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2004 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 855 SC : maulavi hussain haji abraham.umarji vs state of gujarat : while interpreting a provision the court only interprets the law and cannot legislate it
- உதவி ஆணையராக இருந்த வெள்ளதுரை உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு மாநில மனித உரிமை ஆணையம் அபராதம் விதித்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை ரத்து