Skip to content

Primary Menu

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Search for:

Home
Uncategorized
Cs karnan 2nd bail application im mhc

Uncategorized

Cs karnan 2nd bail application im mhc

By Sekar Reporter 2 months ago

Continue Reading

Previous [3/3, 16:58] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1367074315087138816?s=08 [3/3, 16:58] Sekarreporter1: போயஸ் கார்டன் வழக்கு நீதிபதி சேஷசாயி விசாரித்தார் தமிழக அரசு சார்பாக கூடுதல் அட்வகேட் ஜெனரல் எஸ் ஆர் ராஜகோபால் ஆஜராகி மீண்டும் maintanibility குறித்து வாதாடினார் வழக்கு விசாரணை நாளை மதியம் மூன்றாவது நாளாக தொடர்கிறது https://t.co/tjWjAwP8e7

Next Case against railway tribunal full order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.A.No.1315 of 2016 –Social Justice, economic equality are the principles enunciated in the Constitution of India. The public authorities are expected to strive hard to achieve social justice and to minimize the inequality amongst the citizens of our great nation. If we allow such inequalities to prevail long, then we are creating frustration in the minds of common man. It is not only injustice. We failed in our duty to work towards Constitutional goal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Search for:

Recent Posts

Justice V Parthiban said a writ court is not a proper forum to settle a dispute of this nature involving interpretation of contractual terms and agreement and adjudication of the rival claims. MKU had in 2014 entered into an agreement with Coimbatore-based Set Infotect Pvt Ltd for creation of an e-learning portal and development of digital content for the directorate of distance education. On completion of the project stage-wise, the company forwarded the bills from time to time which were settled by the university.
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or Malafide*
Justices T S Sivagnanam and S Ananthi said they do not agree with the submissions of petitioner Muthukaruppan’s counsel that the petition was filed by his client in his private capacity and he has every right to withdraw it.
Justice Anitha Sumanth said that the tabulation of payments, in this case, is joint, the petitioner offering a sum of Rupees Seven Crores (since retracted) and the Officer to ascertain the balance. This exercise has not been carried out and, with this, the requirement of ‘ascertainment’ under Section 74(5), fails

Recent Posts

Justice V Parthiban said a writ court is not a proper forum to settle a dispute of this nature involving interpretation of contractual terms and agreement and adjudication of the rival claims. MKU had in 2014 entered into an agreement with Coimbatore-based Set Infotect Pvt Ltd for creation of an e-learning portal and development of digital content for the directorate of distance education. On completion of the project stage-wise, the company forwarded the bills from time to time which were settled by the university.
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or Malafide*
Justices T S Sivagnanam and S Ananthi said they do not agree with the submissions of petitioner Muthukaruppan’s counsel that the petition was filed by his client in his private capacity and he has every right to withdraw it.
Justice Anitha Sumanth said that the tabulation of payments, in this case, is joint, the petitioner offering a sum of Rupees Seven Crores (since retracted) and the Officer to ascertain the balance. This exercise has not been carried out and, with this, the requirement of ‘ascertainment’ under Section 74(5), fails

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Magazine 7 by AF themes.

CALL ME