Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: Order 9 rule 6(1)(a) ; Order 18 rule 2, 15

[2/24, 18:10] Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: Order 9 rule 6(1)(a) ; Order 18 rule 2, 15

2012(1) SCJ 513

Rasiklal Manickchand Dhariwal & another vs M/s. M. S. S. Food Products

Exparte decree in a suit for passing off- appeal affirmed by High court- defendant filed application after application when trial court directed to dispose off in merits – advocate for defendant stating he has no authority to cross examine and evidence of plaintiff closed- ex parte decree passed- defendant forfeited right to address trial court on merits- once suit closed for judgement order 9 rule 7 has no application- idea is to continue proceedings from where predecessor left-

Order 20 rule 18

2012(1) SCJ 272

Where suit property is not assessed to revenue of government, court got power to revise the preliminary decree or to pass another preliminary decree in changed circumstances
[2/25, 18:25] Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: Order 39 rule 1 & 2 , section 151

2012(1) SCJ 479

Supreme Court Bar Association & others vs B. D. Kaushik

Appeals against interim injunction for amendment on “ one bar one vote” – person who exercise vote in high court or district court association not eligible to contest or vote in SCBA- such amendment not illegal

Order 47 rule 1(1), 4, 5, 8 & section 122

2012(1) SCJ 126

Maltesh Gudda Pooja vs State of Karnataka & others

Two judge of Darwad dismissed appeal- review petition over ruling objection that other bench cannot hear and dispose- high court rules prevail over order in case of inconsistency- only where the judges are not available, review petition can be posted before other bench- when the same judges or one of the judge is available, all efforts be made to place before them

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME