Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: Order 6 rule 17; order 8 rule 6 A

[2/19, 16:56] Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: Order 6 rule 17; order 8 rule 6 A

2011(6) SCJ 3

Gayathri Women’s Welfare Association vs Gowramma & another

Setting up of counter claim after framing of issues permissible- pending appeal respondent sought recovery of possession by amendment- permitting counter claim in this case will amount to reopen of decree granted by trial court- there is no legal or factual basis for interference with decree of trial court

Order 12 rule 6

2011(6) SCJ 520

Himani Alloys Ltd vs Tata Steel Ltd

Suit for recovery of amounts based on accounts- high court found no admission as claimed by plaintiff- however enquired and found different amount as due- high court could not give judgement on such other admission not pleaded
[2/20, 17:53] Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: 2011(6) SCJ 18

Order 22 rule 3

Mangluram Dewangam vs Surendra Singh & others

Trial court dismissed application to implead appellant as legal representative as there is no acceptable evidence to prove Will- High court rejected appeal as order under 22 rule 3 is not a decree and only revision will apply- appellant directed to file revision

Order 33 rule 1 A & 44 rule 1

2011(6) SCJ 406

Mathai M. Paikeday vs C. K. Antony

Regular first appeal preferred before high court to prosecute appeal as indigent- high court without enquiry permitted respondent to institute as indigent- matter remanded- respondent never denied getting money from son and drawing pension- not indigent- appeal allowed

You may also like...