Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: Order 6 rule 17; order 8 rule 6 A
[2/19, 16:56] Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: Order 6 rule 17; order 8 rule 6 A
2011(6) SCJ 3
Gayathri Women’s Welfare Association vs Gowramma & another
Setting up of counter claim after framing of issues permissible- pending appeal respondent sought recovery of possession by amendment- permitting counter claim in this case will amount to reopen of decree granted by trial court- there is no legal or factual basis for interference with decree of trial court
Order 12 rule 6
2011(6) SCJ 520
Himani Alloys Ltd vs Tata Steel Ltd
Suit for recovery of amounts based on accounts- high court found no admission as claimed by plaintiff- however enquired and found different amount as due- high court could not give judgement on such other admission not pleaded
[2/20, 17:53] Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: 2011(6) SCJ 18
Order 22 rule 3
Mangluram Dewangam vs Surendra Singh & others
Trial court dismissed application to implead appellant as legal representative as there is no acceptable evidence to prove Will- High court rejected appeal as order under 22 rule 3 is not a decree and only revision will apply- appellant directed to file revision
Order 33 rule 1 A & 44 rule 1
2011(6) SCJ 406
Mathai M. Paikeday vs C. K. Antony
Regular first appeal preferred before high court to prosecute appeal as indigent- high court without enquiry permitted respondent to institute as indigent- matter remanded- respondent never denied getting money from son and drawing pension- not indigent- appeal allowed