City corporations must create avenues for farmers to sell their produce, says Madras HC. Justice B Pugalendhi recording the submissions stated that “Considering the plight of the farmers, the government is providing so much subsidy and other
City corporations must create avenues for farmers to sell their produce, says Madras HC
The court observed that no avenues are being created by local bodies to sell the farm produce while the contractors are collecting exorbitant daily charges and harassing the gullible farmers
Published: 13th January 2021 07:10 PM | Last Updated: 13th January 2021 07:10 PM | A+A A-
Madras High Court (File photo | EPS)
CHENNAI: The Madras High Court wondered why city corporations are not managing markets on their own and instead renting them out to third party contractors resulting in the harassment of vendors. The court also observed that no avenues are being created by local bodies to sell the farm produce while the contractors are collecting exorbitant daily charges and harassing the gullible farmers.
The issue pertains to the collection of an exorbitant amount as daily charges by a private contractor engaged by the Salem Corporation to manage the daily flower market in Salem. A section of flower vendors who moved the plea alleged that the contractor has been collecting exorbitant charges of Rs 100 daily from each of the shops when the corporation had collected only Rs 20.
According to the petitioners’ counsel VT Balaji, acting on the complaints on exorbitant charges by the contractor, the Salem Corporation terminated the contract. However, the contractor challenged the show-cause notice in the court.
Justice B Pugalendhi recording the submissions stated that “Considering the plight of the farmers, the government is providing so much subsidy and other welfare schemes for the agriculturists. When the agriculturists are raising their products and intending to sell their produce, there are no avenues set out by the local bodies and they are letting it for lease to private contractors under the guise of toll charges resulting in the harassment of gullible farmers.”
The court said, “The corporations are letting out their markets to private contractors… who in turn collect exorbitant toll charges and thereby harassing the vendors and the farmers. This court is inclined to find out as to why the corporation is letting out the private contractors on lease instead of conducting these markets on their own and for what purpose these leases are granted and why not the same shall be done by the corporation itself.”
Taking a serious view of the matter, the court appointed N Suresh as amicus curiae to assist it and also suo motu impleaded the secretary, agricultural department and the director, market
committee.
The court adjourned the plea for a detailed report to be submitted on January 20.
