You may also like...
-
the appellant had a subsisting prior marriage was a ‘highly contentious matter’ which has to be tried on the basis of the evidence on the record – Appeal allowed. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and Bela M Trivedi, JJ. ) MUSSTT REHANA BEGUM — Appellant Vs. STATE OF ASSAM AND ANOTHER — Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 118 of 2022 (Arising Out of SLP(Crl) No. 559 of 2022) (D No. 23852 of 2019)
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 21, 2022
-
https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1725837796588601781?t=WDV_um9UW7IF0MT7GvwM4g&s=08 MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P. No.24968 of 2022 and WMP No.23907 of 2022 Southern Agrifurane Industries (P) Ltd., Rep.by President (Finance) D R Augustine Paulraj MGM Centre, No.1, 9th Street, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004. … Petitioner For Petitioner : Mr.Joseph Prabakar For Respondent : Mr.Haja Nazirudeen Additional Advocate General Asst. by Mr.M.Venkadeswaran Special Govt. Pleader (Tax) O R D E R
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 18, 2023
-
Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/nJlP8FqFvdI [11/16, 12:24] Sekarreporter 1: [11/16, 11:42] Sekarreporter 1: [11/16, 11:38] Sekarreporter 1: Gambling case withdrawn [11/16, 11:40] Sekarreporter 1: ஆன்லைன் கேம்லிங் வழக்கு வாபஸ் Acting Chief Justice wonders how can court pass interim order when no cause of action had arisen due to the Ordinance not having come into force because the Govt is yet to notify it. In the meantime a Bill has also been passed and the Governor is yet to give assent to it.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 16, 2022