SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

ஆவின் பாலை கண்ணாடி பாட்டில் அல்லது டெட்ரா பேக்கில் விற்பனை செய்ய முடியுமா என தமிழக அரசு விளக்கம் அளிக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளதுJustices S Vaidyanathan & PT Asha of Madras HC: Shouldn’t you ban sale of milk in plastic packets? Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran: If it’s hazardous, then we are committed to ban all such materials. I will take instructions to all Your Lordships’ questions.

Uncategorized

ஆவின் பாலை கண்ணாடி பாட்டில் அல்லது டெட்ரா பேக்கில் விற்பனை செய்ய முடியுமா என தமிழக அரசு விளக்கம் அளிக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளதுJustices S Vaidyanathan & PT Asha of Madras HC: Shouldn’t you ban sale of milk in plastic packets? Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran: If it’s hazardous, then we are committed to ban all such materials. I will take instructions to all Your Lordships’ questions.

[8/13, 07:03] Sekarreporter1: ஆவின் பாலை கண்ணாடி பாட்டில் அல்லது டெட்ரா பேக்கில் விற்பனை செய்ய முடியுமா என தமிழக அரசு விளக்கம் அளிக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. தமிழகத்தில் பிளாஸ்டிக் தடை உத்தரவை அமல்படுத்த பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை மறு ஆய்வு செய்யக் கோரி தமிழ்நாடு...

In the result, the Award is set aside. As a corollary, the petitioners are granted leave to institute de novo arbitration proceedings.  If such proceedings are instituted, the petitioners shall be entitled to the benefit of Section 43(4) of the Arbitration Act. Arb.O.P.(Comm.Div)No.20 of 2022 is allowed on the above terms without any order as to costs.                                               Index  : Yes                 12.08.2022 Internet:Yes rrg                                                   SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J.,                           Petitioners   :    Mr.P.Wilson, Senior Advocate,                                                                   Assisted by Mr.R.Priyakumar                                  For Respondent  :    Mr.S.Rajendrakumar                                                                   for M/s.Norton & Grant                   

Uncategorized

In the result, the Award is set aside. As a corollary, the petitioners are granted leave to institute de novo arbitration proceedings.  If such proceedings are instituted, the petitioners shall be entitled to the benefit of Section 43(4) of the Arbitration Act. Arb.O.P.(Comm.Div)No.20 of 2022 is allowed on the above terms without any order as to costs.                                               Index  : Yes                 12.08.2022 Internet:Yes rrg                                                   SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J.,                           Petitioners   :    Mr.P.Wilson, Senior Advocate,                                                                   Assisted by Mr.R.Priyakumar                                  For Respondent  :    Mr.S.Rajendrakumar                                                                   for M/s.Norton & Grant                   

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Order Reserved On   07.07.2022 Order Pronounced on                12.08.2022 C O R A M : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Arb.O.P.(Comm.Div)No.20 of 2022  ...

Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/12/justices-s-vaidyanathan-pt-asha-of-madras-hc-shouldnt-you-ban-sale-of-milk-in-plastic-packetsadditional-advocate-general-j-ravindran-if-its-hazardous-then-we-are-committed-to-ban-all/ [8/12, 19:02] Sekarreporter1: [8/12, 18:56] Sekarreporter1: Justices S Vaidyanathan & PT Asha of Madras HC: Shouldn’t you ban sale of milk in plastic packets? Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran: If it’s hazardous, then we are committed to ban all such materials. I will take instructions to all Your Lordships’ questions.

Uncategorized

Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/12/justices-s-vaidyanathan-pt-asha-of-madras-hc-shouldnt-you-ban-sale-of-milk-in-plastic-packetsadditional-advocate-general-j-ravindran-if-its-hazardous-then-we-are-committed-to-ban-all/ [8/12, 19:02] Sekarreporter1: [8/12, 18:56] Sekarreporter1: Justices S Vaidyanathan & PT Asha of Madras HC: Shouldn’t you ban sale of milk in plastic packets? Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran: If it’s hazardous, then we are committed to ban all such materials. I will take instructions to all Your Lordships’ questions.

[8/12, 19:00] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/12/justices-s-vaidyanathan-pt-asha-of-madras-hc-shouldnt-you-ban-sale-of-milk-in-plastic-packetsadditional-advocate-general-j-ravindran-if-its-hazardous-then-we-are-committed-to-ban-all/ [8/12, 19:02] Sekarreporter1: [8/12, 18:56] Sekarreporter1: Justices S Vaidyanathan & PT Asha of Madras HC: Shouldn’t you ban sale of milk in plastic packets? Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran: If...

Uncategorized

This Court, after hearing the respective parties, is of the view that the issue cannot be kept pending endlessly. Hence, the interim order already granted by this Court on 29.06.2022 is modified to the extent that the investigation shall go on and the petitioner shall cooperate for the enquiry, which will be conducted by the respondents. It is made clear that this Court has not rendered any opinion on the legal submissions made by the parties on merits, including the maintainability of the writ petition, for the reason that the petitioner’s right with regard to the plea raised in the writ petition has got to be protected.                       List this matter on 09.09.2022.              (S.V.N. J.,)       (A.D.J.C. J.,) 04.08.2022       Petitioner Counsel Respondent Counsel G.MANI PRABHU S.RAGHUL R.D.ASHOK KUMAR M/S. N.RAMESH SPC FOR R1 AND R SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMEN      

WP.No.16467 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.15749 of 2022   Petitioner Respondent SHRI ANITHA R.RADHAKRISHNAN S/O. SHRI RAMAMMOORTHY NADAR, NO. 37, POTHIGAI VALAGAM GREENWAYS ROAD, CHENNAI 600028 THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT,, CHENNAI ZONAL OFFICE, SHASTRI BAVAN,...

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.2627 of 2014 orderly order 4 questionsThus, the following questions arise:- (1)Whether the Government Order issued in order dated 16.06.2022 in the matter of abuse of Police force in the name of Orderly in the residences of the higher officials are completely withdrawn or not? (2) Whether the illegal occupation of the Government accommodation by the higher Police officials have been dealt with or not? (3) Whether the usage of black filons in the vehicles of the higher officials are completely banned or not? (4) Whether the misuse of department’s name in private vehicles are removed or not?

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.2627 of 2014 orderly order 4 questionsThus, the following questions arise:- (1)Whether the Government Order issued in order dated 16.06.2022 in the matter of abuse of Police force in the name of Orderly in the residences of the higher officials are completely withdrawn or not? (2) Whether the illegal occupation of the Government accommodation by the higher Police officials have been dealt with or not? (3) Whether the usage of black filons in the vehicles of the higher officials are completely banned or not? (4) Whether the misuse of department’s name in private vehicles are removed or not?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.08.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.2627 of 2014     U.Manickavel                                                                      ..          Petitioner   vs.   1.State Represented...

Smsj for govt aag kumaresan sgp s anitha harinath ஆர்டர்லி முறையை ஒழிக்க ஒரே ஒரு வார்த்தை போதும் என குறிப்பிட்ட நீதிபதி, ஆனால் அந்த வார்த்தை அரசிடமிருந்தோ, காவல்துறை தலைவரிடமிருந்தோ வருவதில்லை என குற்றம்சாட்டியுள்ள சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம், நாட்டின் 75ஆவது சுதந்திர தினத்திலும் ஆங்கிலேய ஆர்டர்லி முறையை பின்பற்றுவது வெட்கக்கேடானது என தெரிவித்துள்ளது.

Uncategorized

Smsj for govt aag kumaresan sgp s anitha harinath ஆர்டர்லி முறையை ஒழிக்க ஒரே ஒரு வார்த்தை போதும் என குறிப்பிட்ட நீதிபதி, ஆனால் அந்த வார்த்தை அரசிடமிருந்தோ, காவல்துறை தலைவரிடமிருந்தோ வருவதில்லை என குற்றம்சாட்டியுள்ள சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம், நாட்டின் 75ஆவது சுதந்திர தினத்திலும் ஆங்கிலேய ஆர்டர்லி முறையை பின்பற்றுவது வெட்கக்கேடானது என தெரிவித்துள்ளது.

ஆர்டர்லி முறையை ஒழிக்க ஒரே ஒரு வார்த்தை போதும் என குறிப்பிட்ட நீதிபதி, ஆனால் அந்த வார்த்தை அரசிடமிருந்தோ, காவல்துறை தலைவரிடமிருந்தோ வருவதில்லை என குற்றம்சாட்டியுள்ள சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம், நாட்டின் 75ஆவது சுதந்திர தினத்திலும் ஆங்கிலேய ஆர்டர்லி முறையை பின்பற்றுவது வெட்கக்கேடானது என தெரிவித்துள்ளது. ல்துறையில்...

Madras high court round up auguat 11

Uncategorized

Madras high court round up auguat 11

[8/10, 21:48] Sekarreporter1: தமிழகத்தில் மதுவை பிளாஸ்டிக் பாட்டில்களில் விற்பனை செய்யும் திட்டம் இல்லை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் டாஸ்மாக் நிறுவனம் பதில் மனு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளது. சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில், பிரதாப் என்பவர் தாக்கல் செய்துள்ள பொதுநல மனுவில், மதுபானங்களை கண்ணாடி பாட்டில்களுக்கு பதில் பிளாஸ்டிக் பாட்டில்களில் விற்பனை செய்ய...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.19963 of 2014 and Justice means justice between both the parties. The interest of justice equally demand that the guilty should be punished and that technicalities and irregularities which do not occasion failure of justice are not allowed to defeat the ends of justice. Principles of natural justice are but the means to achieve the ends of justice. They cannot be perverted to achieve the very opposite end. That would be a counter-productive exercise. Therefore, in the present case, this court has no hesitation in forming an opinion that principles of natural justice as contemplated under Rule 3(a) of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules were followed by the Disciplinary Authority and the petitioner also availed the said opportunity and the punishment imposed cannot be said to be disproportionate or otherwise. For Petitioner               : Mr.K.Venkat Ramani                                                     Senior Advocate                                                     For Mr.M.Muthappan                 For Respondents : Mr.P.Kumaresan                                                     Additional Advocate General                                                     Assisted by                                                     Mrs.S.Anitha                                                     Special Government Pleader                                                               ORDER           The order of postponement of one increment for one year without cumulative effect, which was confirmed by the Appellate Authority is under challenge in the present writ petitio

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.19963 of 2014 and Justice means justice between both the parties. The interest of justice equally demand that the guilty should be punished and that technicalities and irregularities which do not occasion failure of justice are not allowed to defeat the ends of justice. Principles of natural justice are but the means to achieve the ends of justice. They cannot be perverted to achieve the very opposite end. That would be a counter-productive exercise. Therefore, in the present case, this court has no hesitation in forming an opinion that principles of natural justice as contemplated under Rule 3(a) of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules were followed by the Disciplinary Authority and the petitioner also availed the said opportunity and the punishment imposed cannot be said to be disproportionate or otherwise. For Petitioner               : Mr.K.Venkat Ramani                                                     Senior Advocate                                                     For Mr.M.Muthappan                 For Respondents : Mr.P.Kumaresan                                                     Additional Advocate General                                                     Assisted by                                                     Mrs.S.Anitha                                                     Special Government Pleader                                                               ORDER           The order of postponement of one increment for one year without cumulative effect, which was confirmed by the Appellate Authority is under challenge in the present writ petitio

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED  : 11.08.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.19963 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014   M.Mohamed Iqbal                                                                            …Petitioner Vs.  ...