Category: Uncategorized

Appeal filed by Mr.Mukunchand Bothra against Mr.Krishnamurthy @karturiraja on the basis of bounced cheque for some of Rs.65 lakh. Originally, he has filed private complaint where acquittal order with observations that there is no  income proof produced by Mr.Mukunchand Bothra for alleged period as he rendered 65 Lakh to Mr.kasturiraja.

Appeal filed by Mr.Mukunchand Bothra against Mr.Krishnamurthy @karturiraja on the basis of bounced cheque for some of Rs.65 lakh. Originally, he has filed private complaint where acquittal order with observations that there is no income proof produced by Mr.Mukunchand Bothra for alleged period as he rendered 65 Lakh to Mr.kasturiraja.

[7/8, 06:57] Sekarreporter: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/07/08/appeal-against-kasthuriraja-dismissed-for-kasthuriraja-counsel-haja-mohitheen-gisthy-https-t-co-s9a4aslvkg/ [7/8, 06:57] Sekarreporter: Appeal filed by Mr.Mukunchand Bothra against Mr.Krishnamurthy @karturiraja on the basis of bounced cheque for some of Rs.65 lakh. Originally, he has filed private complaint where acquittal...

W.P.No.16704 of 2022 and WMP.No.16013 of 2022  D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.  	Today when the matter is taken up, the second respondent/Commissioner of School Education, Chennai-6, who is present before this Court, has filed a report before this Court along with a Tabulation Chart     This Court, in continuation to the earlier order passed by this Court dated 01.07.2022, makes it clear that applications in respect of teachers who possess the qualification of pass in TET alone be processed.   	3. At the request of the learned Advocate General list the matter on 15.07.2022 at 2.15 p.m.  	   07.07.2022  Jvm       D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.  Jvm

W.P.No.16704 of 2022 and WMP.No.16013 of 2022 D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. Today when the matter is taken up, the second respondent/Commissioner of School Education, Chennai-6, who is present before this Court, has filed a report before this Court along with a Tabulation Chart This Court, in continuation to the earlier order passed by this Court dated 01.07.2022, makes it clear that applications in respect of teachers who possess the qualification of pass in TET alone be processed. 3. At the request of the learned Advocate General list the matter on 15.07.2022 at 2.15 p.m. 07.07.2022 Jvm D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. Jvm

[7/7, 22:41] Sekarreporter: W.P.No.16704 of 2022 and WMP.No.16013 of 2022 D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. Today when the matter is taken up, the second respondent/Commissioner of School Education, Chennai-6, who is present before this Court, has filed...

Teachers appointment full order Sekarreporter: W.P.No.12584 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.12037 &12038 of 2022  D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.  	The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to implement the amendment to Rule 3 of the Tamil Nadu School Education Subordinate Services vide G.O.Ms.No.7, School Education Department dated 20.01.2020 by taking into account

Teachers appointment full order Sekarreporter: W.P.No.12584 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.12037 &12038 of 2022 D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to implement the amendment to Rule 3 of the Tamil Nadu School Education Subordinate Services vide G.O.Ms.No.7, School Education Department dated 20.01.2020 by taking into account

[7/7, 22:42] Sekarreporter: W.P.No.12584 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.12037 &12038 of 2022 D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to implement the amendment to Rule 3 of...

Today the Hon’ble High Court of Madras heard the matter in relation to police protection sought by renowned senior advocate and mediator Mr Sriram Panchu. The matter was heard by Hon’ble Mr Justice Satish Kumar. The petitioner Mr Sriram Panchu was represented by learned senior counsel Mr S Prabakaran, the learned senior counsel vehemently contended that the Z category protection was granted to the petitioner on the basis of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order in Ramjanmabhomi case as the petitioner Mr Sriram Panchu was appointed as one of the mediators in the mediation ordered by the Hon’ble Apex Court and further contended that the prevailing situation in regards with gyanvapi mosque or mathura issue has raised serious threat to the petitioners life as the start point for these issues were the Ayodhya case

Today the Hon’ble High Court of Madras heard the matter in relation to police protection sought by renowned senior advocate and mediator Mr Sriram Panchu. The matter was heard by Hon’ble Mr Justice Satish Kumar. The petitioner Mr Sriram Panchu was represented by learned senior counsel Mr S Prabakaran, the learned senior counsel vehemently contended that the Z category protection was granted to the petitioner on the basis of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order in Ramjanmabhomi case as the petitioner Mr Sriram Panchu was appointed as one of the mediators in the mediation ordered by the Hon’ble Apex Court and further contended that the prevailing situation in regards with gyanvapi mosque or mathura issue has raised serious threat to the petitioners life as the start point for these issues were the Ayodhya case

[7/7, 18:57] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1545036506938904577?t=DC25M-IsPIu_GpEW-Ys4xg&s=08 [7/7, 19:03] Sekarreporter: Today the Hon’ble High Court of Madras heard the matter in relation to police protection sought by renowned senior advocate and mediator Mr Sriram Panchu. The matter...

The assessment order for 2013-14 was passed only on 20/06/2021 after the disposal of the Writ Petition. The appeal though has been preferred is yet to be numbered. Once the order of the Settlement Commission is set aside and the matter is remanded back, status quo ante is restored. The orders of assessment and the unnumbered appeal would become otiose. Therefore, this court has no hesitation in remanding back the matter to the Interim Board, which shall dispose off the application within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order on merits and in accordance with law, after giving sufficient opportunity to the appellant and also by considering all the documents placed. Insofar as the attachment proceedings are concerned, the relief has become infructuous as the attachment was made before six years and maximum period for which such provisional attachment could be in force is only two years. With the above directions, this appeal is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.  (R.M.D.,J.)        (J.S.N.P.,J.)

The assessment order for 2013-14 was passed only on 20/06/2021 after the disposal of the Writ Petition. The appeal though has been preferred is yet to be numbered. Once the order of the Settlement Commission is set aside and the matter is remanded back, status quo ante is restored. The orders of assessment and the unnumbered appeal would become otiose. Therefore, this court has no hesitation in remanding back the matter to the Interim Board, which shall dispose off the application within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order on merits and in accordance with law, after giving sufficient opportunity to the appellant and also by considering all the documents placed. Insofar as the attachment proceedings are concerned, the relief has become infructuous as the attachment was made before six years and maximum period for which such provisional attachment could be in force is only two years. With the above directions, this appeal is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (R.M.D.,J.)        (J.S.N.P.,J.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :   27.06.2022 CORAM : THE  HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal No. 1852 of 2021 and...

.Applying the ratio laid down in the aforesaid decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court to the facts of the present case, this court is of the opinion that the second respondent bank being a secured creditor and created right over the property in question prior to the alleged attachment raised by the appellant and hence, they have preferential right over the claim of the appellant. In such view of the matter, the order of the learned Judge cannot be interfered with.  19.In fine, the writ appeal fails and is accordingly, dismissed. The appellant is directed to lift the attachment over the property in question, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.  There is no order as to costs.  (R.M.D., J.)       (J.S.N.P., J.).      For Appellant  	  :    	  Mr. V. Sundareswaran     For Respondents  	  :    	  Mr. R.N. Amarnath for R1        	     	  Mr.  F.B. Benjamin George for R2  JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN,J.  The order of the learned Judge dated 12.02.2019 made in WP.No. 25185 of 2018 is questioned by the appellant / Revenue, in this writ appeal.

.Applying the ratio laid down in the aforesaid decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court to the facts of the present case, this court is of the opinion that the second respondent bank being a secured creditor and created right over the property in question prior to the alleged attachment raised by the appellant and hence, they have preferential right over the claim of the appellant. In such view of the matter, the order of the learned Judge cannot be interfered with. 19.In fine, the writ appeal fails and is accordingly, dismissed. The appellant is directed to lift the attachment over the property in question, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. There is no order as to costs. (R.M.D., J.)       (J.S.N.P., J.). For Appellant :   Mr. V. Sundareswaran For Respondents :   Mr. R.N. Amarnath for R1 Mr.  F.B. Benjamin George for R2 JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN,J. The order of the learned Judge dated 12.02.2019 made in WP.No. 25185 of 2018 is questioned by the appellant / Revenue, in this writ appeal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :  27.06.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal No. 3249 of 2019 — Assistant Commissioner...

IRAI ANBUSECRETARIAT  CHIEF SECRETARY       CHENNAI – 600 009.     PUBLIC DEPARTMENT  Letter No.25167/CCMS/2022 . dated.6.07.2022  To  Additional Chief Secretaries/ Prl.Secretaries/  Secretaries to Government, Secretariat,Chennai – 9 All Heads of Department, All District Collectors.  Sir / Madam,  Sub: Implementation of Court Orders within the time limit prescribed — To comply the Court orders (or) to file Appeals in time without delay in order to avoid filing of Contempt Proceedings – Certain Instructions issued.     	    Ref: 1. Circular No.38605/CCMS/2020-1, Public (CCMS) Dept, dt.23.12.2020.  Letter No.6609/CCMS/2021-1,Public (CCMS) Dept, dt.27.02.2021  I am to invite attention to the references cited.  The Hon’ble Chief Justice, Hon’ble High Court of Madras has observed that in respect of Orders issued by the Hon’ble Court, implementation of Court Orders are not followed within the stipulated time by the Departments. Of late, it is observed that Writ Appeals are also not filed within the stipulated time given in the Court Orders. This causes the petitioners in most cases to file Contempt against Government Departments for non-implementation of Court Orders.

IRAI ANBUSECRETARIAT CHIEF SECRETARY       CHENNAI – 600 009. PUBLIC DEPARTMENT Letter No.25167/CCMS/2022 . dated.6.07.2022 To Additional Chief Secretaries/ Prl.Secretaries/ Secretaries to Government, Secretariat,Chennai – 9 All Heads of Department, All District Collectors. Sir / Madam, Sub: Implementation of Court Orders within the time limit prescribed — To comply the Court orders (or) to file Appeals in time without delay in order to avoid filing of Contempt Proceedings – Certain Instructions issued. Ref: 1. Circular No.38605/CCMS/2020-1, Public (CCMS) Dept, dt.23.12.2020. Letter No.6609/CCMS/2021-1,Public (CCMS) Dept, dt.27.02.2021 I am to invite attention to the references cited. The Hon’ble Chief Justice, Hon’ble High Court of Madras has observed that in respect of Orders issued by the Hon’ble Court, implementation of Court Orders are not followed within the stipulated time by the Departments. Of late, it is observed that Writ Appeals are also not filed within the stipulated time given in the Court Orders. This causes the petitioners in most cases to file Contempt against Government Departments for non-implementation of Court Orders.

IRAI ANBUSECRETARIAT CHIEF SECRETARY       CHENNAI – 600 009.   PUBLIC DEPARTMENT Letter No.25167/CCMS/2022 . dated.6.07.2022 To Additional Chief Secretaries/ Prl.Secretaries/ Secretaries to Government, Secretariat,Chennai – 9 All Heads of Department, All District Collectors. Sir...

The daughters of Kollywood veteran actor Sivaji Ganesan have filed a civil suit at the Madras High Court accusing their brothers of fraud. However, the property dispute where the daughters – Santhi Narayanasamy and Rajvi Govindarajan – have accused the sons – actor Prabhu and producer Ramkumar – of cheating them of their rightful inheritance, has not got public attention.

The daughters of Kollywood veteran actor Sivaji Ganesan have filed a civil suit at the Madras High Court accusing their brothers of fraud. However, the property dispute where the daughters – Santhi Narayanasamy and Rajvi Govindarajan – have accused the sons – actor Prabhu and producer Ramkumar – of cheating them of their rightful inheritance, has not got public attention.

[7/7, 10:35] Mukesh Puthiyathaimurai Jounalist: Gender Rights: Tamil Star Sivaji Ganesan’s Daughters Fight Sons for Inheritance Daughters of Kollywood veteran actor Sivaji Ganesan have filed a civil suit in Madras High Court over inheritance....

JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF*  *Subject: THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE ,1908*  *Date : 07 JULY 2022*

JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF* *Subject: THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE ,1908* *Date : 07 JULY 2022*

[7/7, 08:20] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1544876371540713477?t=4y2ulOgGASSm-fLNnOJJcA&s=08 [7/7, 08:20] Sekarreporter: [7/7, 08:02] App Chandresekar New: *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF* *Subject: THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE ,1908* *Date :...