Category: Uncategorized

நீதிபதி ஜெயச்சந்திரன் இன்று பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவில், ஜூன் 23ஆம் தேதிக்கு முன்பு இருந்த நிலையே தொடர வேண்டுமென உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளார். பொதுக்குழு மற்றும்

நீதிபதி ஜெயச்சந்திரன் இன்று பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவில், ஜூன் 23ஆம் தேதிக்கு முன்பு இருந்த நிலையே தொடர வேண்டுமென உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளார். பொதுக்குழு மற்றும்

ஜூலை 11ம் தேதி அதிமுக பொதுக்குழுக் கூட்டத்திற்கு தடை விதிக்க மறுத்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து பன்னீர்செல்வம் தரப்பில் தாக்கல் செய்த வழக்கை விசாரித்த உச்ச நீதிமன்றம், வழக்கை மீண்டும் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்திற்கு அனுப்பி, 2 வாரங்களில் விசாரித்து முடிக்க உத்தரவிட்டது. அதன்படி வழக்கு நீதிபதி கிருஷ்ணன்...

Mhc 17th august list

Mhc 17th august list

MHC 17 august list         pdf-embedder url=”https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/17-Aug-2022-List.pdf” title=”17 Aug 2022 List”]    

Plastic case full order Review Application No.89 of 2019     S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.  AND  P.T.ASHA,J.  Mr.V.Chandrasekaran, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd Respondent would submit that, he has not been able to get answers to the queries raised by this Court on the last occasion and that, before the next hearing, he would be tabling the Status Report to that effect. 

Plastic case full order Review Application No.89 of 2019   S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND P.T.ASHA,J. Mr.V.Chandrasekaran, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd Respondent would submit that, he has not been able to get answers to the queries raised by this Court on the last occasion and that, before the next hearing, he would be tabling the Status Report to that effect. 

Review Application No.89 of 2019   S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND P.T.ASHA,J. Mr.V.Chandrasekaran, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd Respondent would submit that, he has not been able to get answers to the queries raised by...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  WRIT JURISDICTION IA No……….…. OF 2022 IN  WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 43/2022     IN THE MATTER OF :  ASHWINI UPADHYAY  Versus.   	  ….PETITIONER     UNION OF INDIA & Ors.   	  ….RESPONDENT        AND IN THE MATTER OF:- DRAVIDA MUNNETRA KAZHAGAM   	  …APPLICANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  WRIT JURISDICTION IA No……….…. OF 2022 IN  WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 43/2022   IN THE MATTER OF : ASHWINI UPADHYAY Versus.  ….PETITIONER UNION OF INDIA & Ors.  ….RESPONDENT AND IN THE MATTER OF:- DRAVIDA MUNNETRA KAZHAGAM  …APPLICANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  WRIT JURISDICTION IA No……….…. OF 2022 IN  WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 43/2022   IN THE MATTER OF : ASHWINI UPADHYAY Versus. ….PETITIONER UNION OF INDIA & Ors. ….RESPONDENT...

Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1559516130712367104?t=a2SnGpQNsO8pYFTNL1MwAw&s=08 [8/16, 17:53] Sekarreporter1: [8/16, 17:51] Sekarreporter1: தெய்வதிரு P. கிருஷ்ணன் மற்றும் லக்ஷ்மி அம்மாள் அவர்களின் மூத்த மகனும் மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் சங்கர் முரளி அவர்களின் தந்தையுமான K.சண்முகம் B.SC.,B.Ed (தலைமை ஆசிரியர் ஓய்வு, அரசு மேல்நிலை பள்ளி, தைலாபுரம்) அவர்கள் 16.08.2022 அன்று மதியம் சுமார் 12 மணியளவில் சிவலோக பிராப்தி அடைந்தார்கள் என்பதை ஆழ்ந்த வருத்தத்துடன் தெரிவித்துக்கொள்கிறோம்.

Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1559516130712367104?t=a2SnGpQNsO8pYFTNL1MwAw&s=08 [8/16, 17:53] Sekarreporter1: [8/16, 17:51] Sekarreporter1: தெய்வதிரு P. கிருஷ்ணன் மற்றும் லக்ஷ்மி அம்மாள் அவர்களின் மூத்த மகனும் மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் சங்கர் முரளி அவர்களின் தந்தையுமான K.சண்முகம் B.SC.,B.Ed (தலைமை ஆசிரியர் ஓய்வு, அரசு மேல்நிலை பள்ளி, தைலாபுரம்) அவர்கள் 16.08.2022 அன்று மதியம் சுமார் 12 மணியளவில் சிவலோக பிராப்தி அடைந்தார்கள் என்பதை ஆழ்ந்த வருத்தத்துடன் தெரிவித்துக்கொள்கிறோம்.

[8/16, 17:53] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1559516130712367104?t=a2SnGpQNsO8pYFTNL1MwAw&s=08 [8/16, 17:53] Sekarreporter1: [8/16, 17:51] Sekarreporter1: தெய்வதிரு P. கிருஷ்ணன் மற்றும் லக்ஷ்மி அம்மாள் அவர்களின் மூத்த மகனும் மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் சங்கர் முரளி அவர்களின் தந்தையுமான K.சண்முகம் B.SC.,B.Ed (தலைமை ஆசிரியர் ஓய்வு, அரசு மேல்நிலை பள்ளி, தைலாபுரம்)...

[8/16, 16:55] Sekarreporter1: Days after Chief Justice of India designate U.U. Lalit said, courts can begin functioning from 9 am, Justice G.R. Swaminathan today began hearing admission cases itself from 9 am at the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. https://t.co/XmbP5sbPrP [8/16, 16:55] Sekarreporter1: 🌹

[8/16, 16:55] Sekarreporter1: Days after Chief Justice of India designate U.U. Lalit said, courts can begin functioning from 9 am, Justice G.R. Swaminathan today began hearing admission cases itself from 9 am at the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. https://t.co/XmbP5sbPrP [8/16, 16:55] Sekarreporter1: 🌹

[8/16, 16:55] Sekarreporter1: Days after Chief Justice of India designate U.U. Lalit said, courts can begin functioning from 9 am, Justice G.R. Swaminathan today began hearing admission cases itself from 9 am at the...

[8/16, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: Justice RN Manjula of Madras HC directs a man to vacate his house & find an alternative accommodation since his wife had complained of harassment & abuse in front of two children. Orders that he would be removed with police assistance if he does not vacate voluntarily @THChennai [8/16, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: When the businessman complained of his advocate wife always remaining outdoors for her work, the judge said: “If a woman chooses to be independent and do something more than being a housewife and if it is not taken well by her husband, that makes her life horrible.”

[8/16, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: Justice RN Manjula of Madras HC directs a man to vacate his house & find an alternative accommodation since his wife had complained of harassment & abuse in front of two children. Orders that he would be removed with police assistance if he does not vacate voluntarily @THChennai [8/16, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: When the businessman complained of his advocate wife always remaining outdoors for her work, the judge said: “If a woman chooses to be independent and do something more than being a housewife and if it is not taken well by her husband, that makes her life horrible.”

[8/16, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: Justice RN Manjula of Madras HC directs a man to vacate his house & find an alternative accommodation since his wife had complained of harassment & abuse in front of two...

In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai made in A.No.1 of 2021 in O.P.No.4476 of 2019 dated 11.04.2022 is modified and the respondent is directed to leave the house where the petitioner and the children live and find an alternate accommodation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, the respondent shall be removed from the matrimonial home with the help of police protection. The petitioner is at liberty to file a petition before the family court for getting appropriate orders like police protection, in case, the respondent fails to leave the matrimonial home by himself.  In the event of such petition is filed, the learned Judge of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai, shall consider and pass necessary orders in accordance with law.  No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.  Index: Yes/No  Speaking / Non Speaking Order gsk  To  I Additional Family Court, Chennai.  	   11.08.2022  R.N.MANJULA, J.  gsk  C.R.P (PD).No.1824 of 2022 and  C.M.P.No.9350 of 2022  11.08.2022. For Petitioner           :    Ms.S.P.Arthi  For Respondent       :    Mr.D.Suresh Kumar

In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai made in A.No.1 of 2021 in O.P.No.4476 of 2019 dated 11.04.2022 is modified and the respondent is directed to leave the house where the petitioner and the children live and find an alternate accommodation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, the respondent shall be removed from the matrimonial home with the help of police protection. The petitioner is at liberty to file a petition before the family court for getting appropriate orders like police protection, in case, the respondent fails to leave the matrimonial home by himself.  In the event of such petition is filed, the learned Judge of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai, shall consider and pass necessary orders in accordance with law.  No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index: Yes/No Speaking / Non Speaking Order gsk To I Additional Family Court, Chennai.  11.08.2022 R.N.MANJULA, J. gsk C.R.P (PD).No.1824 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.9350 of 2022 11.08.2022. For Petitioner           :    Ms.S.P.Arthi For Respondent       :    Mr.D.Suresh Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 18.07.2022 Pronounced on  11.08.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA C.R.P (PD).No.1824 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.9350 of 2022 V.Anusha … Petitioner Vs. B.Krishnan …  Respondent...