SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

5.Public money has been wasted due to adamant behaviour not only of the officer who terminated the services but also due to cantankerous attitude adopted by those responsible for pursuing the litigation before the one or the other authority. They have literally persecuted her. Despite unequal strength the opposite party has managed to survive. We are informed that the opposite party has been reinstated. This was put forward as bonafide conduct of petitioner to persuade us to modify the order in respect of back wages. Facts speak otherwise. Working life of opposite party has been lost in this tortuous and painful litigation of more than twenty years. For such thoughtless acts of its officers the petitioner-society has to suffer and pay an amount exceeding three lakhs is indeed pitiable. But considering the agony and suffering of the opposite party that amount cannot be a proper recompense. We, therefore, dismiss this petition as devoid of any merit and direct the petitioner to comply with the directions of the High Court within the time granted by it. We however leave it open to the society to replenish itself and recover the amount of back wages paid by it to the opposite party from the personal salary of the officers of the society who have been responsible for this endless litigation including the officer who was responsible for terminating the services of the opposite patty. We may clarify that the permission given, shall have nothing to do with the direction to pay the respondent her back wages. Step if any to recover the amount shall be taken only after payment is made to the opposite party as directed by the High Court…. ” No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (S.V.N., J.)    (M.S.Q., J.)                                                                                                       12.01.2023 Speaking order/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ar                               S.VAIDYANATHAN, J. and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. ar PRE-DELIVERY JUDGMENT IN W.A.No.1692 of 2022   12.01.2023

Uncategorized

5.Public money has been wasted due to adamant behaviour not only of the officer who terminated the services but also due to cantankerous attitude adopted by those responsible for pursuing the litigation before the one or the other authority. They have literally persecuted her. Despite unequal strength the opposite party has managed to survive. We are informed that the opposite party has been reinstated. This was put forward as bonafide conduct of petitioner to persuade us to modify the order in respect of back wages. Facts speak otherwise. Working life of opposite party has been lost in this tortuous and painful litigation of more than twenty years. For such thoughtless acts of its officers the petitioner-society has to suffer and pay an amount exceeding three lakhs is indeed pitiable. But considering the agony and suffering of the opposite party that amount cannot be a proper recompense. We, therefore, dismiss this petition as devoid of any merit and direct the petitioner to comply with the directions of the High Court within the time granted by it. We however leave it open to the society to replenish itself and recover the amount of back wages paid by it to the opposite party from the personal salary of the officers of the society who have been responsible for this endless litigation including the officer who was responsible for terminating the services of the opposite patty. We may clarify that the permission given, shall have nothing to do with the direction to pay the respondent her back wages. Step if any to recover the amount shall be taken only after payment is made to the opposite party as directed by the High Court…. ” No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (S.V.N., J.)    (M.S.Q., J.)                                                                                                       12.01.2023 Speaking order/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ar                               S.VAIDYANATHAN, J. and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. ar PRE-DELIVERY JUDGMENT IN W.A.No.1692 of 2022   12.01.2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   Reserved on Pronounced on 13.12.2022 12.01.2023   CORAM   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ   W.A.No.1692 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.11739...

Judge chandrasekar விடுதலை சிறுத்தைகள் கட்சி தலைவர் தொல்.திருமாவளவன் உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு எதிரான கொலை முயற்சி வழக்கின் விசாரணை நிலை குறித்த அறிக்கையை தாக்கல் செய்ய காவல் துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

Uncategorized

Judge chandrasekar விடுதலை சிறுத்தைகள் கட்சி தலைவர் தொல்.திருமாவளவன் உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு எதிரான கொலை முயற்சி வழக்கின் விசாரணை நிலை குறித்த அறிக்கையை தாக்கல் செய்ய காவல் துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

விடுதலை சிறுத்தைகள் கட்சி தலைவர் தொல்.திருமாவளவன் உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு எதிரான கொலை முயற்சி வழக்கின் விசாரணை நிலை குறித்த அறிக்கையை தாக்கல் செய்ய காவல் துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. விடுதலை சிறுத்தைகள் கட்சி தலைவர் தொல்.திருமாவளவனை சந்திக்க கட்சி அலுவக்கத்திற்கு சென்ற தன்னை கட்சி அலுவலகத்தில்...

Judge anitha sumanth பழனி தண்டாயுத பாணி கோவிலுக்கு தானமாக வழங்கப்பட்ட 220 ஏக்கர் சொத்துக்களை மீட்க எடுத்த நடவடிக்கை குறித்து விரிவான அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்யும்படி தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

Uncategorized

Judge anitha sumanth பழனி தண்டாயுத பாணி கோவிலுக்கு தானமாக வழங்கப்பட்ட 220 ஏக்கர் சொத்துக்களை மீட்க எடுத்த நடவடிக்கை குறித்து விரிவான அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்யும்படி தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

பழனி தண்டாயுத பாணி கோவிலுக்கு தானமாக வழங்கப்பட்ட 220 ஏக்கர் சொத்துக்களை மீட்க எடுத்த நடவடிக்கை குறித்து விரிவான அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்யும்படி தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. பழனி தண்டாயுத பாணி கோவிலுக்கு, கோவை மாவட்டம், பொள்ளாச்சியைச் சேர்ந்த பலர் 220 ஏக்கர்...

R sureskumar judge நீதிமன்ற தீர்ப்புகளை சார் பதிவாளர் அலுவலகங்களில் பதிவு செய்வது குறித்து சுற்றறிக்கை பிறப்பிக்க ஜனவரி 31ம் தேதி வரை தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு கூடுதல் அவகாசம் வழங்கி சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது

Uncategorized

R sureskumar judge நீதிமன்ற தீர்ப்புகளை சார் பதிவாளர் அலுவலகங்களில் பதிவு செய்வது குறித்து சுற்றறிக்கை பிறப்பிக்க ஜனவரி 31ம் தேதி வரை தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு கூடுதல் அவகாசம் வழங்கி சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது

  நீதிமன்ற தீர்ப்புகளை சார் பதிவாளர் அலுவலகங்களில் பதிவு செய்வது குறித்து சுற்றறிக்கை பிறப்பிக்க ஜனவரி 31ம் தேதி வரை தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு கூடுதல் அவகாசம் வழங்கி சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. விழுப்புரம் மாவட்டம், திண்டிவனம் தாலுகாவில் உள்ள கீழ்புதுப்பட்டு கிராமத்தில் உள்ள 2.50 ஏக்கர்...

Notification No.16 /2023   SITTING ARRANGEMENT – PARTIAL MODIFICATIONS     The following partial modifications are made in the Sitting Arrangement in the Principal Seat at Madras with effect from 19.01.2023. 

Uncategorized

Notification No.16 /2023   SITTING ARRANGEMENT – PARTIAL MODIFICATIONS     The following partial modifications are made in the Sitting Arrangement in the Principal Seat at Madras with effect from 19.01.2023. 

  Notification No.16 /2023   SITTING ARRANGEMENT – PARTIAL MODIFICATIONS    The following partial modifications are made in the Sitting Arrangement in the Principal Seat at Madras with effect from 19.01.2023.  Principal Seat at...

C.S.No.7 of 2023 and A.No.54 and 55 of 2023 in C.S.No.86 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. COMMON ORDER About three suits were instituted by members or Synod Council members of the Church of South India (CSI).  In the said suits, several interlocutory applications were filed.  Out of the three suits, one suit is  under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 

Uncategorized

C.S.No.7 of 2023 and A.No.54 and 55 of 2023 in C.S.No.86 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. COMMON ORDER About three suits were instituted by members or Synod Council members of the Church of South India (CSI).  In the said suits, several interlocutory applications were filed.  Out of the three suits, one suit is  under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 

O.A.Nos.818 and 819 of 2022 in C.S.No.274 of 2022 and O.A.No.21 and 22 of 2023 in C.S.No.7 of 2023 and A.No.54 and 55 of 2023 in C.S.No.86 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. COMMON ORDER...

On instructions, learned Additional Advocate General would submit that, with regard to the directions issued by this Court already to the Inspector General of Registration to issue a comprehensive circular for implementation of the orders already passed by this Court in this regard pertaining to Section 23 of the Registration Act is concerned, it is under the active consideration of the Department as well as the Government to make some amendment in the relevant provisions of the Registration Act and it would take some reasonable time. Hence, the learned Additional Advocate General seeks four weeks time. Considering the said submission made by the learned Additional Advocate General and taking into account the pouring in of writ petitions on this issue which has become an everyday affair, in order to curtail the same, an early decision in this regard from the Government or the Department is appreciable. Page 1 of 2 W.P.Nos.33616 of 2022 etc., batch R.SURESH KUMAR, J. KST

Uncategorized

On instructions, learned Additional Advocate General would submit that, with regard to the directions issued by this Court already to the Inspector General of Registration to issue a comprehensive circular for implementation of the orders already passed by this Court in this regard pertaining to Section 23 of the Registration Act is concerned, it is under the active consideration of the Department as well as the Government to make some amendment in the relevant provisions of the Registration Act and it would take some reasonable time. Hence, the learned Additional Advocate General seeks four weeks time. Considering the said submission made by the learned Additional Advocate General and taking into account the pouring in of writ petitions on this issue which has become an everyday affair, in order to curtail the same, an early decision in this regard from the Government or the Department is appreciable. Page 1 of 2 W.P.Nos.33616 of 2022 etc., batch R.SURESH KUMAR, J. KST

W.P.Nos.33616 of 2022 etc., batch W.P.Nos.33616 of 2022 etc., batch R.SURESH KUMAR, J. Heard Mr.S.Silambanan, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent State in all these cases. On instructions, learned Additional Advocate General...

Vinoth pandian law tips Vinothpandian: Supreme court ; WP No ( criminal ) 113 of 2016 dated 3 – 01 – 2023 : kaushal kishor vs state of Uttar pradesh : In India , the government can be held liable for tortious acts of its servants and can be ordered to be paid compensation to the persons suffering as a result of the legal wrong

Uncategorized

Vinoth pandian law tips Vinothpandian: Supreme court ; WP No ( criminal ) 113 of 2016 dated 3 – 01 – 2023 : kaushal kishor vs state of Uttar pradesh : In India , the government can be held liable for tortious acts of its servants and can be ordered to be paid compensation to the persons suffering as a result of the legal wrong

[1/7, 11:36] Vinothpandian: Supreme court ; WP No ( criminal ) 113 of 2016 dated 3 – 01 – 2023 : kaushal kishor vs state of Uttar pradesh : In India , the government...

respect of rental arrears, the second respondent/sub-tenant is directed to pay the rental arrears of Rs.3,45,000/- [Rupees Three Lakhs and Forty Five Thousand only] as on December’2022 to the revision petitioner/landlord within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order as per the decree passed in HRCOP No.11 of 2016 dated 13.06.2017. Learned Government Advocate [Puducherry] has to report compliance of the orders of this Court regarding eviction of the premises and handing over vacant possession to the revision petitioner/landlord on 19.01.2023. Post on 19.01.2023 under the caption “for reporting compliance”. 12.01.2023 gm Note to office: (i) Issue today (12.01.2023) (ii)Registry is directed to issue a copy of the order to the learned Government Advocate [Puducherry]. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. gm C.R.P.No.4244 of 2022 12.01.2023

Uncategorized

respect of rental arrears, the second respondent/sub-tenant is directed to pay the rental arrears of Rs.3,45,000/- [Rupees Three Lakhs and Forty Five Thousand only] as on December’2022 to the revision petitioner/landlord within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order as per the decree passed in HRCOP No.11 of 2016 dated 13.06.2017. Learned Government Advocate [Puducherry] has to report compliance of the orders of this Court regarding eviction of the premises and handing over vacant possession to the revision petitioner/landlord on 19.01.2023. Post on 19.01.2023 under the caption “for reporting compliance”. 12.01.2023 gm Note to office: (i) Issue today (12.01.2023) (ii)Registry is directed to issue a copy of the order to the learned Government Advocate [Puducherry]. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. gm C.R.P.No.4244 of 2022 12.01.2023

C.R.P.No.4244 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.22270 of 2022 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J Pursuant to the order dated 10.01.2023 passed by this Court, the second respondent/sub-tenant is present before this Court. The second respondent/sub-tenant states that partially he...