You may also like...
-
Sangetha hotel case THE HON’BLE MR. SANJAY V. GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY O.S.A.(CAD).Nos.125 & 126 of 2023 1.M/s. Rasnam Foods Private Limited, An Indian Company The colour scheme, get-up and style have to be changed in respect of the Tamil version of the name of the appellants/defendants also so as to be dissimilar than that of the respondent/plaintiff; (iii) The appellants/defendants shall also issue an advertisement of half-page size in at least two leading English and Tamil Newspapers having wide circulation throughout the state, that their business/restaurants is fresh, their own and have no-connection whatsoever with that of plaintiff’s ‘Sangeetha”;
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 3, 2023
-
GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *The Hon’ble Justice S.M. Subramaniam* was pleased to allow *CRP No. 2845 of 2022 [Tmt. R. Nalini vs. Tmt. R. Nirmala]* and quashed the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Suramangalam, Salem, made under the provisions of Section 21(2)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 13, 2022
-
6/25, 21:21] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1276181202530115584?s=08 [6/25, 21:21] Sekarreporter 1: [6/25, 21:16] Senior Advt S Prabagaran: “Bar Council is the Leader of the Bar” declares the Constitution Bench, Supreme Court. Adi Pherozshah Gandhi v. H.M. Seervai, Advocate General of Maharashtra AIR 1971 SC 385 – (1970) 2 SCC 484
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 25, 2020