Author: Sekar Reporter

Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1559516130712367104?t=a2SnGpQNsO8pYFTNL1MwAw&s=08 [8/16, 17:53] Sekarreporter1: [8/16, 17:51] Sekarreporter1: தெய்வதிரு P. கிருஷ்ணன் மற்றும் லக்ஷ்மி அம்மாள் அவர்களின் மூத்த மகனும் மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் சங்கர் முரளி அவர்களின் தந்தையுமான K.சண்முகம் B.SC.,B.Ed (தலைமை ஆசிரியர் ஓய்வு, அரசு மேல்நிலை பள்ளி, தைலாபுரம்) அவர்கள் 16.08.2022 அன்று மதியம் சுமார் 12 மணியளவில் சிவலோக பிராப்தி அடைந்தார்கள் என்பதை ஆழ்ந்த வருத்தத்துடன் தெரிவித்துக்கொள்கிறோம்.

Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1559516130712367104?t=a2SnGpQNsO8pYFTNL1MwAw&s=08 [8/16, 17:53] Sekarreporter1: [8/16, 17:51] Sekarreporter1: தெய்வதிரு P. கிருஷ்ணன் மற்றும் லக்ஷ்மி அம்மாள் அவர்களின் மூத்த மகனும் மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் சங்கர் முரளி அவர்களின் தந்தையுமான K.சண்முகம் B.SC.,B.Ed (தலைமை ஆசிரியர் ஓய்வு, அரசு மேல்நிலை பள்ளி, தைலாபுரம்) அவர்கள் 16.08.2022 அன்று மதியம் சுமார் 12 மணியளவில் சிவலோக பிராப்தி அடைந்தார்கள் என்பதை ஆழ்ந்த வருத்தத்துடன் தெரிவித்துக்கொள்கிறோம்.

[8/16, 17:53] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1559516130712367104?t=a2SnGpQNsO8pYFTNL1MwAw&s=08 [8/16, 17:53] Sekarreporter1: [8/16, 17:51] Sekarreporter1: தெய்வதிரு P. கிருஷ்ணன் மற்றும் லக்ஷ்மி அம்மாள் அவர்களின் மூத்த மகனும் மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் சங்கர் முரளி அவர்களின் தந்தையுமான K.சண்முகம் B.SC.,B.Ed (தலைமை ஆசிரியர் ஓய்வு, அரசு மேல்நிலை பள்ளி, தைலாபுரம்)...

[8/16, 16:55] Sekarreporter1: Days after Chief Justice of India designate U.U. Lalit said, courts can begin functioning from 9 am, Justice G.R. Swaminathan today began hearing admission cases itself from 9 am at the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. https://t.co/XmbP5sbPrP [8/16, 16:55] Sekarreporter1: 🌹

[8/16, 16:55] Sekarreporter1: Days after Chief Justice of India designate U.U. Lalit said, courts can begin functioning from 9 am, Justice G.R. Swaminathan today began hearing admission cases itself from 9 am at the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. https://t.co/XmbP5sbPrP [8/16, 16:55] Sekarreporter1: 🌹

[8/16, 16:55] Sekarreporter1: Days after Chief Justice of India designate U.U. Lalit said, courts can begin functioning from 9 am, Justice G.R. Swaminathan today began hearing admission cases itself from 9 am at the...

[8/16, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: Justice RN Manjula of Madras HC directs a man to vacate his house & find an alternative accommodation since his wife had complained of harassment & abuse in front of two children. Orders that he would be removed with police assistance if he does not vacate voluntarily @THChennai [8/16, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: When the businessman complained of his advocate wife always remaining outdoors for her work, the judge said: “If a woman chooses to be independent and do something more than being a housewife and if it is not taken well by her husband, that makes her life horrible.”

[8/16, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: Justice RN Manjula of Madras HC directs a man to vacate his house & find an alternative accommodation since his wife had complained of harassment & abuse in front of two children. Orders that he would be removed with police assistance if he does not vacate voluntarily @THChennai [8/16, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: When the businessman complained of his advocate wife always remaining outdoors for her work, the judge said: “If a woman chooses to be independent and do something more than being a housewife and if it is not taken well by her husband, that makes her life horrible.”

[8/16, 16:18] Sekarreporter1: Justice RN Manjula of Madras HC directs a man to vacate his house & find an alternative accommodation since his wife had complained of harassment & abuse in front of two...

In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai made in A.No.1 of 2021 in O.P.No.4476 of 2019 dated 11.04.2022 is modified and the respondent is directed to leave the house where the petitioner and the children live and find an alternate accommodation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, the respondent shall be removed from the matrimonial home with the help of police protection. The petitioner is at liberty to file a petition before the family court for getting appropriate orders like police protection, in case, the respondent fails to leave the matrimonial home by himself.  In the event of such petition is filed, the learned Judge of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai, shall consider and pass necessary orders in accordance with law.  No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.  Index: Yes/No  Speaking / Non Speaking Order gsk  To  I Additional Family Court, Chennai.  	   11.08.2022  R.N.MANJULA, J.  gsk  C.R.P (PD).No.1824 of 2022 and  C.M.P.No.9350 of 2022  11.08.2022. For Petitioner           :    Ms.S.P.Arthi  For Respondent       :    Mr.D.Suresh Kumar

In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai made in A.No.1 of 2021 in O.P.No.4476 of 2019 dated 11.04.2022 is modified and the respondent is directed to leave the house where the petitioner and the children live and find an alternate accommodation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, the respondent shall be removed from the matrimonial home with the help of police protection. The petitioner is at liberty to file a petition before the family court for getting appropriate orders like police protection, in case, the respondent fails to leave the matrimonial home by himself.  In the event of such petition is filed, the learned Judge of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai, shall consider and pass necessary orders in accordance with law.  No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index: Yes/No Speaking / Non Speaking Order gsk To I Additional Family Court, Chennai.  11.08.2022 R.N.MANJULA, J. gsk C.R.P (PD).No.1824 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.9350 of 2022 11.08.2022. For Petitioner           :    Ms.S.P.Arthi For Respondent       :    Mr.D.Suresh Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 18.07.2022 Pronounced on  11.08.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA C.R.P (PD).No.1824 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.9350 of 2022 V.Anusha … Petitioner Vs. B.Krishnan …  Respondent...

Rs 5 Cr recieved as cash by the actor for movie ‘Puli’ in addition to Rs 16 Cr received through cheque. This apart, Vijay has admitted another Rs 10 Cr undisclosed income for the financial yr during the raid

Rs 5 Cr recieved as cash by the actor for movie ‘Puli’ in addition to Rs 16 Cr received through cheque. This apart, Vijay has admitted another Rs 10 Cr undisclosed income for the financial yr during the raid

[8/16, 11:57] Sekarreporter1: [8/16, 11:17] Sekarreporter1: Justice Anita Sumanth of Madras High Court begins hearing case against income tax proceedings initiated against actor C. Joseph Vijay pursuant to search and seizure operations. He has...

[8/16, 11:17] Sekarreporter1: Justice Anita Sumanth of Madras High Court begins hearing case against income tax proceedings initiated against actor C. Joseph Vijay pursuant to search and seizure operations. He has challenged the proceedings on the ground of limitation. @THChennai @TheHinduCinema [8/16, 11:17] Sekarreporter1: Judge grants interim stay. Directs income tax department to file it’s counter by Sep 16.

[8/16, 11:17] Sekarreporter1: Justice Anita Sumanth of Madras High Court begins hearing case against income tax proceedings initiated against actor C. Joseph Vijay pursuant to search and seizure operations. He has challenged the proceedings on the ground of limitation. @THChennai @TheHinduCinema [8/16, 11:17] Sekarreporter1: Judge grants interim stay. Directs income tax department to file it’s counter by Sep 16.

[8/16, 11:17] Sekarreporter1: Justice Anita Sumanth of Madras High Court begins hearing case against income tax proceedings initiated against actor C. Joseph Vijay pursuant to search and seizure operations. He has challenged the proceedings...

[8/16, 11:28] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1559419184924094464?t=sHsqXdL47m_ELl0woYdChQ&s=08 [8/16, 11:28] Sekarreporter1: [8/16, 11:20] Sekarreporter1: Ops case இன்று தீர்ப்பு இல்லை [8/16, 11:21] Sekarreporter1: 🌹

[8/16, 11:28] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1559419184924094464?t=sHsqXdL47m_ELl0woYdChQ&s=08 [8/16, 11:28] Sekarreporter1: [8/16, 11:20] Sekarreporter1: Ops case இன்று தீர்ப்பு இல்லை [8/16, 11:21] Sekarreporter1: 🌹

  8/16, 11:28] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1559419184924094464?t=sHsqXdL47m_ELl0woYdChQ&s=08 [8/16, 11:28] Sekarreporter1: [8/16, 11:20] Sekarreporter1: Ops case இன்று தீர்ப்பு இல்லை [8/16, 11:21] Sekarreporter1: 🌹

மதுரை ஆதினத்திற்கு சொந்தமான இடத்தில் கட்டப்பட்டு வரும் மேல்நிலை நீர் தேக்க தொட்டியை இடிக்கக் கோரி சென்னை உயர் நிதிமன்றத்தில் மனுத்தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது.

மதுரை ஆதினத்திற்கு சொந்தமான இடத்தில் கட்டப்பட்டு வரும் மேல்நிலை நீர் தேக்க தொட்டியை இடிக்கக் கோரி சென்னை உயர் நிதிமன்றத்தில் மனுத்தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது.

நாகப்பட்டினம் மாவட்டத்தில் மதுரை ஆதினத்திற்கு சொந்தமான இடத்தில் கட்டப்பட்டு வரும் மேல்நிலை நீர் தேக்க தொட்டியை இடிக்கக் கோரி சென்னை உயர் நிதிமன்றத்தில் மனுத்தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது. மதுரை ஆதினத்தின் மேலாளர் சார்பில் தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ள மனுவில், மதுரை ஆதினத்துக்குச் சொந்தமாக மதுரை, தஞ்சாவூர், நாகப்பட்டினம் உள்ளிட்ட பல்வேறு...

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE  W.P.No.20435 of 2022  M.Valsala Mampatta        For Petitioner            : Mr.V.Ramana Reddy                                   For Respondents       : Mr.Rajesh Vivekanandan       Asst. Solicitor General       For R.1 and R.2       Mr.S.J.Mohammed Sathik       Government Advocate                 For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the fourth respondent  to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 15.09.2021, seeking for sanction of monthly pension under the Freedom Fighters Pension Scheme within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioner is eligible for sanction of monthly pension under the Freedom Fighters Pension Scheme,  the fourth respondent is directed to recommend the case of the petitioner to the second respondent for sanction of monthly pension to the petitioner.         

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.20435 of 2022 M.Valsala Mampatta        For Petitioner            : Mr.V.Ramana Reddy                                  For Respondents       : Mr.Rajesh Vivekanandan      Asst. Solicitor General      For R.1 and R.2      Mr.S.J.Mohammed Sathik      Government Advocate                For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 15.09.2021, seeking for sanction of monthly pension under the Freedom Fighters Pension Scheme within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioner is eligible for sanction of monthly pension under the Freedom Fighters Pension Scheme,  the fourth respondent is directed to recommend the case of the petitioner to the second respondent for sanction of monthly pension to the petitioner.         

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.08.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.20435 of 2022 M.Valsala Mampatta                                       … Petitioner   Versus 1.Union of India Ministry of Home...

8/15, 09:04] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Legal Eagles Elites presents Independence Day Special  Topic: Law as Proponent of Woman Rights Faculty: Shangar Murali, Advocate, High Court Madras

8/15, 09:04] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Legal Eagles Elites presents Independence Day Special Topic: Law as Proponent of Woman Rights Faculty: Shangar Murali, Advocate, High Court Madras

[8/15, 09:04] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Legal Eagles Elites presents Independence Day Special Topic: Law as Proponent of Woman Rights Faculty: Shangar Murali, Advocate, High Court Madras Date: 15-8-2022 (Monday) Time: 4:00 PM Onwards Join Zoom...