You may also like...
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 22, 2020
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 6, 2021
JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.Nos.23366 to 23369 of 2015—-For Petitioners in .. Mr.K.Balaji W.P.Nos.23366 and 23367 of 2015 For Petitioner in W.P.No.23368/2015 … Mr.N.G.R.Prasad, for M/s.Row & Reddy For Petitioner in … Mr.D.Vijayakumar W.P.No.23369/2015 For Respondents .. Mr.S.Karthikai Balan, 1 and 2 in all W.Ps. Government Advocate For 3rd Respondent .. Mr.A.Saravanan # 15.In such view of the matter, this Court deems it fit and appropriate to direct the second respondent to modify the date of grant of approval to the date of initial appointment of the petitioners. Accordingly, the second respondent is directed to grant approval for the appointment of the petitioners from the date of their initial appointment and consequently, pay the difference in salary and other benefits for the disputed period to them, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Such payment shall not bear any interest, as the petitioners have filed their respective affidavits dated 31.03.2021 to the effect that they will not claim interest for the difference in salary and other benefits for the disputed period. The impugned proceedings / orders passed by the second respondent are set aside and the matter is remanded back to the second respondent for passing fresh orders, to that extent alone.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 2, 2021