![[7/12, 07:45] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/hc-bats-for-higher-salary-to-court-employees/article32054299.ece [7/12, 07:45] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/madras-high-court-grants-time-to-rbi-to-respond-to-case-against-irac-norms/article32051334.ece/amp/ [7/12, 07:45] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/vested-interests-acting-against-development-of-siddha-hc/article32054680.ece](http://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story 7/10, 11:43] Sekarreporter 1: [7/10, 11:42] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1281471182269640704?s=08 [7/10, 11:42] Sekarreporter 1: [7/10, 11:40] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Iam deeply saddened to know that one of the doyens of our bar senior Advocate V T Gopalan sir is not with us now ….. A very simple
- Previous story [7/10, 11:21] Sekarreporter 1: [7/10, 11:17] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1281464831489396737?s=08 [7/10, 11:17] Sekarreporter 1: He says as per #CBSE rules such pvt institutions are supposed to maintain 25% of their corpus fund as reserve to be utilised during exigencies like #COVID19 #lockdown [7/10, 11:17] Sekarreporter 1: While TN govt has decided to permit pvt educational institutions to collect fees in three instalments, a lawyer on behalf of parents has moved #MadrasHC not to take a final decision without hearing them https://t.co/2VagrnoMc5 [7/10, 11:21] Sekarreporter 1: [7/10, 11:20] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1281464438239883264?s=08 [7/10, 11:21] Sekarreporter 1: [7/10, 11:14] Mubarak Advt Mhc: vtg A true gentleman and a legal luminary respected by all. May his soul rest peace. [7/10, 11:14] Sekarreporter 1: 🙏🏽 [7/10, 11:21] Sekarreporter 1: [7/10, 11:19] Sekarreporter 1: #BREAKING தமிழகம் முழுவதும் கல்வி கட்டணத்தை வசூலிக்கக்கூடாது என்ற அரசாணையை ரத்து செய்ய கோரி வழக்கு கல்விக் கட்டணம் தொடர்பான அனைத்து வழக்குகளும் 17-ம் தேதி விசாரணை #SunNews #Tngovt #schools #Highcourt https://t.co/4aYR6ccNWx [7/10, 11:19] Sekarreporter 1: All india educational institution general Secretry Palaniappan case and other association case
Recent Posts
- Today 6 law tips / [20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 287 : Priyanka srivastava vs state of UP : when a borrower of financial institution covered under the SARFASI act , invokes jurisdiction under sec 156 (3) CRPC and also there is a separate procedure under Recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act , an attitude of more care , caution and circumspection has to be adhered to[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC 39 ; Joseph shine vs union.of india : A bench disagreeing with decision.of a larger or coequal bench can only refer the matter to a larger bench , it cannot disagree or dissent[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: civil.appeal no 363 of 2022 dated 10- 02 – 2022 Bank of baroda vs M / S karwa trading company and another : In a SARFASI proceedings , unless and until borrower ready to deposit / pay entire amount payable together with all costs and expenses with secured creditor , borrower cannot be discharged from entire liability outstanding[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 830 : saradhammal vs sankaralingam : Held transfer of immovable property under attachment with knowledge of attachment vitiates transfer ( sec 52 transfer of property act 1882 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
- [20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus
- Juniors of Senior Govindaswinathan award function[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of late Senior adv Govindaswinathan award function held Sunday naradaganasaba 10.30 morning
- PLAINT LIFELINE OF LITIGATION
- DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC IS MAINTAINABLE FROM THE APPELLAT’S COURT DECREE OF REVERSING THE REJECTION OF PLAINT DECREE:-
More
Recent Posts
- Today 6 law tips / [20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 287 : Priyanka srivastava vs state of UP : when a borrower of financial institution covered under the SARFASI act , invokes jurisdiction under sec 156 (3) CRPC and also there is a separate procedure under Recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act , an attitude of more care , caution and circumspection has to be adhered to[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC 39 ; Joseph shine vs union.of india : A bench disagreeing with decision.of a larger or coequal bench can only refer the matter to a larger bench , it cannot disagree or dissent[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: civil.appeal no 363 of 2022 dated 10- 02 – 2022 Bank of baroda vs M / S karwa trading company and another : In a SARFASI proceedings , unless and until borrower ready to deposit / pay entire amount payable together with all costs and expenses with secured creditor , borrower cannot be discharged from entire liability outstanding[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 830 : saradhammal vs sankaralingam : Held transfer of immovable property under attachment with knowledge of attachment vitiates transfer ( sec 52 transfer of property act 1882 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
- [20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus
- Juniors of Senior Govindaswinathan award function[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of late Senior adv Govindaswinathan award function held Sunday naradaganasaba 10.30 morning
- PLAINT LIFELINE OF LITIGATION
- DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC IS MAINTAINABLE FROM THE APPELLAT’S COURT DECREE OF REVERSING THE REJECTION OF PLAINT DECREE:-