You may also like...
-
-
SM subramaniyam judge and Rajasekar judge full order ////// Finally, regarding the quantum of punishment, we are of the opinion that the Judicial Officers are expected to maintain high level of integrity and in the present case, the charge Nos.1 and 4 against the writ petitioner, were held proved. The proved charges, viz., charge Nos.1 and 4 are grave in nature, touching upon the integrity and honesty of the Judicial Officer. Therefore, the punishment of removal from service, cannot be construed as disproportionate to the gravity of the proved charges. Thus, we are not inclined to interfere with the quantum of punishment. Consequently, the present writ petition stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 18, 2024
-
Item no 30, before Hon’ble Justice p t Asha Section 34 application was filed challenging an award. Based on the same award an execution proceeding was initiated before Kanchipuram Distrixt Court which was subsequently stayed by the High Court. Upon verification and contradictions with the Award copy, the Arbitrator was directed to be present before the Court. Also notice was issued by Justice Asha to the Bar council of Tamil Nadu directing them to verify enrolment details of the Arbitrator who passed out in 2013z The Arbitrator was present before the Court today and stated that this is a fraudulently obtained award and that he did not appear as a arbitrator at any point of time. The Hon’ble judge directed the Arbitrator to file an affidavit and the matter is posted to 9.01.20. Petitioner counsel- S.Sivaraman
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 7, 2020