3/3, 11:59] Sekarreporter1: [3/3, 11:57] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1366997846797418500?s=08 [3/3, 11:57] Sekarreporter1: Former judge Karnan bail adj march 9 th judge v barathidasan https://t.co/eC0rLCFfMI [3/3, 12:04] Sekarreporter1: [3/3, 12:04] Sekarreporter1:

[3/3, 11:59] Sekarreporter1: [3/3, 11:57] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1366997846797418500?s=08
[3/3, 11:57] Sekarreporter1: Former judge Karnan bail adj march 9 th judge v barathidasan https://t.co/eC0rLCFfMI
[3/3, 12:04] Sekarreporter1: [3/3, 12:04] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1367000244039290881?s=08
[3/3, 12:04] Sekarreporter1: Former judge Karnan bail adj march 9 th judge v barathidasan for bar — for bar council secretary c raja kumar senior advt s Prabakaran argued https://t.co/RRTlP2HkLs
[3/3, 12:08] Sekarreporter1: The second bail petition filed by Former Judge C.S.Karnan came up before the Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. Bharathidasan. On behalf of the Petitioner Mr. G Rajagopal , Senior Advocate appeared. On behalf of the intervener Senior Advocate S. PRABAKARAN appeared for the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry. The Learned Judge raised the query regarding the status of the investigation to the public prosecutor.Further G. Rajagopal sr. Adv. Argued that if this court required they are ready to file an affidavit and at the same time the prosecutor stated that Mr. C.S.Karnan refused to undergo medical test . Number of times the respondent police tried to have a medical test for Mr. C.S. karnan but ended in vain. The intervener Senior Advocate S.Prabakaran told the court that in this bail petition filed by the learned Senior Advocate G.Rajagopal appearing for the petitioner whereby they mentioned that this is not a serious offence. Opposing the bail by the BCTNP is by itself a discrimination and the same is totally false. This itself shows the attitude of the Former Judge Mr.C.S.karnan.The Learned intervener Senior Advocate S.Prabakaran further asked suppose if he comes out what is the guarantee that he will not indulge in any such activities. Therefore the learned intervener wants to file a detailed counter. In the meantime the Learned APP Mrs. PRABAVATHI wanted to file status report regarding the investigation. FURTHERMORE LEARNED SENIOR ADVOCATE Mr.S. PRABAKARAN said that in normal course this court will grant bail and there is no issue. But this man knowing fully well and defaming the higher judiciary. Therefore this court has to deal this matter seriously and this Honble court adjourned the matter to 9/3/21.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME