You may also like...
[1/7, 17:06] sekarreporter1: [1/7, 17:02] K.Chandru Former Highcourt Judge: There is a difference between stay of conviction and suspension of sentence! The minister got the second one. The conviction doesnt get wiped out. He has to quit. Otherwise he will be dismissed by the governor!! [1/7, 17:03] sekarreporter1: 🍁🍁 [1/7, 17:03] sekarreporter1: Super [1/7, 17:16] sekarreporter1: [1/7, 17:14] Rajesh Mha Librarian: If High Court stays the trail court order and later if the appeal allowed then NO DISQUALIFICATION. [1/7, 17:15] Rajesh Mha Librarian: 😄 Have to wait upto SC order … [1/7, 17:16] sekarreporter1: [1/7, 16:28] sureyapragasam: Lilly Thomas case [1/7, 17:15] sureyapragasam: He lost his post and m.L.A post the minute judgement is pronounced [1/7, 17:43] sekarreporter1: [1/7, 17:43] Dmk Annamalai: ANNAAMALAI ADVOCATE In the case of a person who on the date of the conviction is a member of Parliament or the Legislature of a State, take effect until three months have elapsed from that date or, if within that period an appeal or application for revision is brought in respect of the conviction or the sentence, until that appeal or application is disposed of by the court. [1/7, 17:43] sekarreporter1: 🍁 [1/7, 17:56] sekarreporter1: [1/7, 17:45] Dmk Annamalai: However we have to look into conviction under which sections.because of that exemption was given as mentioned in 8(1) [1/7, 17:52] Dmk Annamalai: In this group it was posted that he was convicted, sentenced for a period of 3years that throwing a stone on the bus. It’s denoting that damage to public property.—(1)Whoever commits mischief by doing any act in respect of any public property, other than public property of the nature referred to in sub-section (2), shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and with fine [1/7, 17:54]
by sekar · Published January 7, 2019
THE HON’BLE MRS.VIJAYA K.TAHILRAMANI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P. No.24182 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos. 23966 & 23967 of 2019 The Institute of the Brothers of St.Patrick, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai – 600 020 Rep. by its Secretary … Petitioner v. 1 The Corporation of Chennai, Rep by its Commissioner, Rippon Building, Egmore Chennai – 600 003 2 The Zonal Deputy Commissioner (South), Corporation of Chennai, Zonal Office South, Latiz Bridge Road, Adyar Chennai – 600 020 .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records calling for the records relating to impugned order of the 2nd respondent herein bearing Va (Thu) Na. Ka. No. A11/ 003/ 2019, dated 27.07.2019 and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to restore status quo ante in respect of the property of an extent of 2 hectares 10 ares and 40 square metres of land in Block No.
by sekar · Published August 30, 2019