You may also like...
-
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.592 of 2021 Moorthi … Appellant Before parting with the case, this court places on record its appreciation to the Learned Counsel for the appellant, who despite all the facts stacked against the appellant/accused, had left no stone unturned to defend the accused by raising all the points, but still arguing in a manner befitting as the officer of this Court. 29.07.2022. For Appellant : Mr.S.Subramaniya for Mr.S.Sathish Rajan For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 3, 2022
-
S m subramani judge full order
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 10, 2020
-
30/01, 10:29] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1752156930750226897?t=X94bZZk7CpK0OkqVNSVCGQ&s=08[30/01, 10:29] sekarreporter1: [30/01, 10:28] sekarreporter1: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALAC.M.A.Nos.1468 and 1469 of 2020andC.M.P.No.10765 of 20201.P.Rajendran2.P.Parthiban3.P.Govindaraj4.P.Sundararajan5.R.Prasanth…Appellant’s in both C.M.A.Nos.Vs.K.R.Govindarajan (died)1.K.R.G.Narayanan….Respondent in both C.MA.Nos.2.Rajasekaran3.Thirunavukkarasu4.Gopal5.Mani6.Natarajan(No notice is necessary as the respondents2 to 6 remained absent and set ex partethroughout and hence notice on respondents2 to 6 may be dispensed with)…Respondents in C.M.A.No.1469 of 2020[30/01, 10:29] sekarreporter1: the present case also, one of the reasons assigned by the Appellate Courtfor rejecting the secondary evidence of the Will dated 01.11.1969, is that signaturesof attestors and attesting evidence do not appear. From the aforesaid Judgment, it isclear that the said reason cannot be a ground for rejecting the secondary evidence.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 30, 2024