2/26, 17:45] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1365273681568534530?s=08 [2/26, 17:46] Sekarreporter1: [2/26, 17:39] Sekarreporter1: Tomorrow lordship s Vaithiyanathan j special sitting in mhc to complete the remaing list cases [2/26, 17:40] Sekarreporter1: THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN TO BE HEARD THROUGH VIDEO

[2/26, 17:45] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1365273681568534530?s=08
[2/26, 17:46] Sekarreporter1: [2/26, 17:39] Sekarreporter1: Tomorrow lordship s Vaithiyanathan j special sitting in mhc to complete the remaing list cases
[2/26, 17:40] Sekarreporter1: THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN
TO BE HEARD THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING ON SATURDAY THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 AT 10.30.A.M.
COURT NO. VC 39
THE ADVOCATES/PARTY IN PERSON ARE REQUESTED
1. TO INSTALL MICROSOFT TEAMS VC APPLICATION IN THEIR DESKTOP/LAPTOP / I-PAD /
MOBILE PHONE AND TO JOIN THE COURT VC SESSION CLICK HERE
2. TO MENTION THE ITEM NO AND NAME WHILE LOGIN TO THE COURT.
3. TO MAINTAIN PROPER DRESS CODE.
4. TO MUTE THEIR MIC WHILE OTHER COUNSEL IS IN ARGUMENT, TO PREVENT UNWANTED NOISE
DISTURBANCE DURING THE VIDEO CONFERENCING AND UNMUTE THE MIC ONLY AT THE TIME OF
THEIR ARGUMENT.
5. LAWYERS TO KEEP THEIR VIDEOS ON BUT MIC OFF.
6. ADVOCATES ARE REQUESTED NOT TO MENTION IN THE VIRTUAL HEARING
IN RESPECT OF LISTING OF CASES. THEY SHALL GIVE LETTER TO THE REGISTRY
FOR LISTING OF CASES AFTER SERVING THE OTHER SIDE
EITHER THROUGH E-MAIL OR WHATSAPP.
7. ADVOCATES ARE REQUESTED TO FURNISH THEIR CELL NUMBER, EMAIL ID, SO THAT,
THE SAME ARE DISPLAYED ALONG WITH THEIR NAMES IN THE SCREEN,
TO ENABLE THE COUNSEL APPEARING ON THE OTHER SIDE TO NOTE DOWN THE SAME
AND FORWARD THEIR PLEADINGS.
8. COURT LINK ALSO AVAILABLE IN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/vclink
FOR ADMISSION
1 WP/4409/2021
(Service)
N.MURUGADOSS
VS
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND 2
OTHERS.
K.JENITHA
K.LEEMA ROSE
V.SAMUEL
——————
Chennai
AND
WP 4420/2021
(Service) A.GANGAN
VS
THE STATE OF TAMINADU AND 2
OTHERS.
K.JENITHA
K.LEEMA ROSE
V.SAMUEL
——————
Kancheepuram
AND
WP 4421/2021
(Service) K.SHANKAR
VS
THE STATE OF TAMINADU AND 2
OTHERS.
K.JENITHA
K.LEEMA ROSE
V.SAMUEL
——————
Kancheepuram
AND
WP 4423/2021
(Service) A.DEENADHAYALAN ALIAS DHAYALAN
VS
THE STATE OF TAMINADU AND 2
OTHERS.
K.JENITHA
K.LEEMA ROSE
V.SAMUEL
——————
Chennai
2 WP/4422/2021
(Service)
TAMILNADU QUALIFIED COLLEGE
VS
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT AND 2 OTHERS.
M.SRIRAM
RAMESH VENKATACHALAPATHY
P.UDAYA
——————
Tiruvannamalai
AND
WMP 5025/2021
Dispensed with (d.w)
TAMILNADU QUALIFIED COLLEGE
VS
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT AND 2 OTHERS.
M.SRIRAM
RAMESH VENKATACHALAPATHY
P.UDAYA
——————
Tiruvannamalai
AND
WMP 5026/2021
Injunction
TAMILNADU QUALIFIED COLLEGE
VS
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT AND 2 OTHERS.
M.SRIRAM
RAMESH VENKATACHALAPATHY
P.UDAYA
——————
Tiruvannamalai
AND
WMP 5027/2021
Stay
TAMILNADU QUALIFIED COLLEGE
VS
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT AND 2 OTHERS.
M.SRIRAM
RAMESH VENKATACHALAPATHY
P.UDAYA
——————
Tiruvannamalai
AND
WMP 5028/2021
Direction
TAMILNADU QUALIFIED COLLEGE
VS
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT AND 2 OTHERS.
M.SRIRAM
RAMESH VENKATACHALAPATHY
P.UDAYA
——————
Tiruvannamalai
3 WP/4440/2021
(Service)
J.PANDIARAJAN (RTD. INSPECTOR OF
POLICE)
VS
THE DIRCTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
AND 2 OTHERS.
M.PRABU
G.SARATH KUMAR
——————
Dharmapuri
1/8 SVNJ (27/02/2021) – MOTION LIST

You may also like...