11mlas update; CJI agreed with submissions of Mr. Mukul Rohatgi Senior Advocate that his preliminary objections to maintainability of appeals by dmk is correct. However it is facts of the case Mr. Vijaynarayan, Advocate General was requested by the court to ascertain views from speaker as to what he proposes to do now that all the pending proceedings have concluded. To this end case has been adjourned to 14th Feb. Most importantly, the court emphatically said that it would not even wander let alone encroach into the jurisdiction of the speaker as he is a high constitutional authority.Therefore it is completely and totally wrong to say Speaker has been called upon to explain his or state reasons

11mlas update; CJI agreed with submissions of Mr. Mukul Rohatgi Senior Advocate that his preliminary objections to maintainability of appeals by dmk is correct.
However it is facts of the case Mr. Vijaynarayan, Advocate General was requested by the court to ascertain views from speaker as to what he proposes to do now that all the pending proceedings have concluded. To this end case has been adjourned to 14th Feb.
Most importantly, the court emphatically said that it would not even wander let alone encroach into the jurisdiction of the speaker as he is a high constitutional authority.Therefore it is completely and totally wrong to say Speaker has been called upon to explain his or state reasons

You may also like...