07:50] Sekarreporter: [7/18, 07:49] Sekarreporter: [7/17, 19:54] Shyllappa Kalyan Advt: N SHYLLAPPA KALYAN VS. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER Myself filed PIL against Election Commission of India before the Madras High Court praying that the EPIC I’d number and Aadhar I’d number should be

[7/18, 07:50] Sekarreporter: [7/18, 07:49] Sekarreporter: [7/17, 19:54] Shyllappa Kalyan Advt: N SHYLLAPPA KALYAN VS. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER Myself filed PIL against Election Commission of India before the Madras High Court praying that the EPIC I’d number and Aadhar I’d number should be included while registering the deaths of a person which will enable to remove them from the voter list. It is widely noted that deceased persons are included in the voters list.

Matter was heard by Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr Justice Sanjeeb Banerjee and Hon’ble Justice Mr Senthil Kumar ramamoorthy. Though the Bench declined to entertain the petition, it has stated that it is for the Parliament or Election Commission to consider the Policy and Hoping that Election Commission will consider the same for maintaining purity of electoral rolls.
[7/17, 20:07] Sekarreporter: ЁЯЩП
[7/18, 07:49] Sekarreporter: W.P.(MD) No.2353 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.07.2021
CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.P.(MD) No.2353 of 2021
N.Shyllappa Kalyan .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Chief Election Commissioner
Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road
New Delhi 110 001.
2. The Chief Electoral Officer
Public (Elections) Department
Secretariat, Fort St. George
Chennai 600 009.
3. Government of Tamil Nadu
Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department
Through its Secretary
Secretariat, Fort St. George
Chennai 600 009.
4. The Ministry of Health and Welfare
Through its Secretary
Secretariat, Fort St. George
Chennai 600 009.
5. The Director
Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
No.64/75, Main Road, Chokkalingam Nagar
Teynampet, Chennai 600 086. .. Respondents
__________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
[7/18, 08:31] Sekarreporter: [7/18, 08:25] G Karuppasamy pandiyan, Advocate.: .It is pertinent to mention here that the trial Judge has failed to
appreciate the age of the victim girl and not understood the relevant
provisions of POCSO Act. In many cases, this Court observed that the
Special Judges who deal with cases under POCSO Act, not properly
understood the scope and object of the POCSO Act. Before posting any
Sessions Judge to the Special Court which deals with the cases under
POCSO Act, have to necessarily sensitise and impart training to them
through Tamil Nadu State Judicial Academy. The Registrar General and
Director of State Judicial Academy have to necessarily take steps for the
same after getting necessary approval from My Lord The Honourable
Chief Justice as Patron-in-Chief and Board of Governors of the State
Judicial Academy.
[7/18, 08:27] Sekarreporter: ЁЯТР

You may also like...