₹ 100 croes damage suit legal notice to bjp leader Anamalai by dmk Alanthur barathi. Madras high court advocates full legal debate through my whatsapp

[3/26, 19:40] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/_F6X3_vp7-s
[3/27, 07:43] Sekarreporter: [3/27, 00:02] V subramani Advt: Locus is another question….if it is in individual capacity…aggrieved can make complaint…..if it is official capacity….pp could initiate proceedings…..But under what capacity…RS Barathi sent notice…..???
[3/27, 00:02] V subramani Advt: Make it clear….iam not affilated wt any political parties….Everything is purely question of law and on academic interest…..not to blame anyone else
[3/27, 07:39] V subramani Advt: Notice sent by RS Bharthi doesn’t meet criteria laid down under 499 and 500 of IPC….having regard to exceptions carved there under..and under article 19 of constitution….
[3/27, 07:40] V subramani Advt: Recent Judicial trend is ….quashing defamation cases……filed on political lines….affirming the freedom of expression…enshirned in the constitution..
[3/27, 09:21] Sekarreporter: [3/27, 09:12] Mohamad Rafic: Locus Standii.

Basic Fundamental position of Criminal law is that the law can be set in motion by any one other than the cases that are personal in nature like matrimonial cases bigamy or Cruelty…

The statement of defamation is against the state at large and as against CM of the state in discharge of his public duty, function and service to the people of state to attract global enterpreners and and in the interest of economy of the State.. ..

Certainly both factually and legally the statement made against the chief Minister is not covered under any of the exceptions….

The law laid down by the judicial precedents decisions on every point are dynamic and not static and keep changing.

Almost on every major point of law we have 50% of judicial decisions each on either side to argue. ( both for and against) leading to uncertainty in the firm legal position
Of law…

What was law laid down yesterday is changed /interpreted/ revisited /reviewed the next day by the same Judicial precedents.

In the absence of codifications of judicial decisions by a well founded methodology
accuulations of new cases and avoidance of delay in disposal of cases are imminent. ..
[3/27, 09:21] Sekarreporter: 🌹
[3/27, 09:59] Sekarreporter: [3/27, 09:51] Mohamad Rafic: In my view the Highest Court on the Administrative side may constitute a body of experts from the Bench snd Bar to consolidate and codify all the settled principles of law based on Judicial decisions relating to the cases of docket explosion..

For example atleast in 1000 heads of major legal heading codifications of judgements may have to be done to save precious Judicial time and judicial resources.

Such codified judgements should not ordinarily be revisited by future judgements under the guise of interpretation by future judicial decisions except in rarest of rare cases.
[3/27, 09:52] Mohamad Rafic: Most of the pendacy of cases revolve around these major 1000 legal topics in various courts across the country.
[3/27, 10:13] Sekarreporter: [3/27, 10:11] V subramani Advt: My friend needs to examine the difinition of AGGRIEVED PERSON…under 199(1) of crpc wt reference to ratios governing the field….Any member of party or citizens of a state can’t be aggrieved party over allegation against their leader..This well settled principle…
[3/27, 10:13] Sekarreporter: …
[3/27, 10:18] Sekarreporter: [3/27, 10:15] V subramani Advt: In a democracy ..allegations and counter allegations of corruption by…among political parties can’t be eleveted to the level of qualifying reasonable restrictions….otherwise the very democracy concept wil collapse ..rendering sprit and object of article 19 ineffective
[3/27, 10:16] V subramani Advt: No legal basis for my friend’s clarification
[3/27, 10:37] Sekarreporter: [3/27, 10:21] V subramani Advt: Let us avoid mere general statement….sekar..law need to change to the change of times…having regard to ground situation….it can’t be codified…just like personal laws
[3/27, 10:36] Sekarreporter: 🌹
[3/27, 10:50] Sekarreporter: [3/27, 10:43] Advt JAGANNATHAN: Sir Just to impress the leader. There is a judgment recently who can file a defamation. Complete waste of time. Nothing will happen and it will quashed within no time. Tks
[

p W I L S O N AS SO C I ATES Date: 26.03.2022 K. Annamalai State President, Tamil Nadu Bharatiya Janata Party, Kamalalayam , Vaidyaraman Street, Parthasarathi Puram, T. Nagar, Chennai 600 017 LEGAL NOTICE Sir, Under instructions from our client Mr. R.S. Bharathi, Organising Secretary, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam having office at ‘Anna Arivalayam’, No. 367 & 369, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018, we hereby issue you the following legal notice: 1. Our client states that https://sekarreporter.com/p-w-i-l-s-o-n-as-so-c-i-ates-date-26-03-2022-k-annamalai-state-president-tamil-nadu-bharatiya-janata-party-kamalalayam-vaidyaraman-street-parthasarathi-puram-t-nagar-chennai-600-017-legal-no/