You may also like...
-
the amendment and insertion of Sections 22A, 22B and 77A of the Act. Thus, the petitioner as well as the complainant in the present case have to redress their respective grievances before the competent Civil Court of law. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the impugned order dated 15.07.2022 passed by the first respondent is quashed. Consequently, the parties are at liberty to workout their remedies before the competent Civil Court of law in the manner contemplated. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 25.07.2023 Index:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes Speaking order hvk To The District Registrar, South Chennai, Fanepet, Nandhanam, Chennai – 35. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. hvk W.P.No.19239 of 2023 25.07.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 22, 2023
-
Former Union Minister M.K. Alagiri moves HC to quash case:
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 4, 2019
-
Gov appeal dismissed THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.(MD)No.1339 of 2023 and. sports category dated Nil published on 24.07.2023 (MBBS/BDS) (Government quota) Course 2023-2024 Session) by the 3rd respondent and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to issue revised rank list for special reservation for Eminent Sports Person by awarding 330 marks to the first respondent and accordingly to conduct counselling for these sports quota
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 11, 2023