Follow:
- Next story Writ petition challenging government notification of May 14, 2021 appointing a person from the Indian Administrative Service cadre as the Commissioner of School Education. Held no merit—-cj bench full order—For Petitioner For Respondents : Mrs.Narmatha Sampath for M/s.T.C.Gopalakrishnan : Mr.R.Shunmugasundaram Advocate-General assisted by Ms.Shabnam Banu Counsel for the State ORDER
- Previous story திரு பி. வில்சன் மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் அவர்கள் நீட் தேர்வை தமிழகத்தில் ரத்து செய்ய மாண்பு மிகு நீதியரசர் ஏகே ராஜன் கமிட்டியிடம் கொடுத்த மனுவின் சுருக்கம் ——
Recent Posts
- Temple land order judge velmurugan for Petitioner : Mr.M.RamamoorthiFor R1 to R5 : Mr.A.SelvendranSpecial Government PleaderFor R6 : Mrs.Rita Chandrasekar andMr.Aditya Chandramouli SC for CMDA
- Admk flag symbol order judge Sathikumar //For Applicant : Mr.Vijay Narayan, Senior Counsel for Mr.GowthamkumarFor Respondent : Mr.P.H.Aravindh Pandian, Senior Counsel in O.A.Nos.787 & 788 of 2023for Mrs.P.RajalakshmiMr.Abdul Saleem, Senior Counsel in O.A.No.789 of 2023for Mrs.P.RajalakshmiCOMMON ORDER
- Petitioner : Mr.A.L.Gandhimathi Senior CounselFor Mr.L.PalanimuthuFor R1 & R2 : Mrs.S.Premalatha, Junior St.CounselMr.R.S.BalajiSenior Standing CounselFor R3 : Mr.J.C.DurairajAddl.Govt.PleaderFor R4 : Mrs.Sameer BhuvaneshwariParty in person O R D E R The writ petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 16.02.2023 passed by the second respondent/the Tax Recovery Officer-III under Rule 11(1) of Second Schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1769897257468625220?t=5og8-IWC85zuTzMpAeMv6Q&s=08[19/03, 06:53] sekarreporter1: Aa[18/03, 18:00] sekarreporter1: Contempt plea against ‘Savukku’ Shankar | Madras High Court judge kumaresh babu directs him to submit explanation https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/contempt-plea-against-savukku-shankar-madras-high-court-directs-him-to-submit-explanation/article67963548.ece[18/03, 18:21] sekarreporter1: “
- SM subramaniyam judge and Rajasekar judge full order ////// Finally, regarding the quantum of punishment, we are of the opinion that the Judicial Officers are expected to maintain high level of integrity and in the present case, the charge Nos.1 and 4 against the writ petitioner, were held proved. The proved charges, viz., charge Nos.1 and 4 are grave in nature, touching upon the integrity and honesty of the Judicial Officer. Therefore, the punishment of removal from service, cannot be construed as disproportionate to the gravity of the proved charges. Thus, we are not inclined to interfere with the quantum of punishment. Consequently, the present writ petition stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
More
Recent Posts
- Temple land order judge velmurugan for Petitioner : Mr.M.RamamoorthiFor R1 to R5 : Mr.A.SelvendranSpecial Government PleaderFor R6 : Mrs.Rita Chandrasekar andMr.Aditya Chandramouli SC for CMDA
- Admk flag symbol order judge Sathikumar //For Applicant : Mr.Vijay Narayan, Senior Counsel for Mr.GowthamkumarFor Respondent : Mr.P.H.Aravindh Pandian, Senior Counsel in O.A.Nos.787 & 788 of 2023for Mrs.P.RajalakshmiMr.Abdul Saleem, Senior Counsel in O.A.No.789 of 2023for Mrs.P.RajalakshmiCOMMON ORDER
- Petitioner : Mr.A.L.Gandhimathi Senior CounselFor Mr.L.PalanimuthuFor R1 & R2 : Mrs.S.Premalatha, Junior St.CounselMr.R.S.BalajiSenior Standing CounselFor R3 : Mr.J.C.DurairajAddl.Govt.PleaderFor R4 : Mrs.Sameer BhuvaneshwariParty in person O R D E R The writ petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 16.02.2023 passed by the second respondent/the Tax Recovery Officer-III under Rule 11(1) of Second Schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1769897257468625220?t=5og8-IWC85zuTzMpAeMv6Q&s=08[19/03, 06:53] sekarreporter1: Aa[18/03, 18:00] sekarreporter1: Contempt plea against ‘Savukku’ Shankar | Madras High Court judge kumaresh babu directs him to submit explanation https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/contempt-plea-against-savukku-shankar-madras-high-court-directs-him-to-submit-explanation/article67963548.ece[18/03, 18:21] sekarreporter1: “
- SM subramaniyam judge and Rajasekar judge full order ////// Finally, regarding the quantum of punishment, we are of the opinion that the Judicial Officers are expected to maintain high level of integrity and in the present case, the charge Nos.1 and 4 against the writ petitioner, were held proved. The proved charges, viz., charge Nos.1 and 4 are grave in nature, touching upon the integrity and honesty of the Judicial Officer. Therefore, the punishment of removal from service, cannot be construed as disproportionate to the gravity of the proved charges. Thus, we are not inclined to interfere with the quantum of punishment. Consequently, the present writ petition stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.