![Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Litigant who comes to court and invoke its writ jurisdiction must come with clean hand , litigant cannot prevaricate and take inconsistent positions[05/04, 15:49] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 448 : chenrayan vs kaveri ( died ) : Mere long and continuous possession of immovable for over twelve years does not convert possession into prescriptive title](http://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story 2/12 W.P.No.34099/2019 & Batch Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned selection list, dated 20.11.2019, issued by the third respondent in respect of P.G.Assistants in Chemistry, quash the same, consequently, direct the respondents to select the petitioner as P.G. Assistant in Chemistry and appoint her in the said post. For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Jothimanian For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mrs.V.Annalakshmi, Government Advocate. For Respondent 3 : Mr.C.Munusamy, Spl.Govt.Pleader. COMMON ORDER The common issue that has been raised in all these Writ Petitions is that the candidates, who secured high marks and should have been fitted in General Turn, have been fitted in MBC/DNC Quota and, thereby, 34 persons, who would have got seats under MBC Quota, have been deprived of selection. 2. The third respondent issued a Notification on 12.06.2019, inviting applications through On-line from eligible candidates for direct recruitment to the posts of Post Graduate Assistants/Physical Education http://www.judis.nic.in
- Previous story [1/20, 15:54] sekarreporter1: SC rejects Nirbhaya case death row convict Pawan Kumar’s plea that he was a juvenile at the time of crime in December 2012. SC accepted police plea that his birth certificate showed that he was 19 years at the time of crime. [1/20, 15:54] sekarreporter1: 🦜
Recent Posts
- Minister sekar babu pa case full order / mhc/ Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the third respondent is not on election duty and if the third respondent, being a government servant, engages in acts which are not in consonance with the Tamil Nadu Government Servants’ Conduct Rules, 1973, then it is for the employer to take action. He further submits that respondents 1 and 2 would take necessaryaction on the basis of the complaint received from the petitioner.In view of the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of.There shall be no order as to costs.(S.V.G., CJ.) (J.S.N.P., J.)18.04.2024Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NosasiTo:1.The Election Commissioner,Election Commission of India, Nivachan Bhavan, New Delhi.2.The Chief Electoral Officer,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,Chennai-600 009. THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(sasi)
- Tn medium qouta case wp allowed full order of THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
- [18/04, 17:29] Krishna Malai Murasu: திருநெல்வேலி தொகுதி பாஜக வேட்பாளர் நயினார் நாகேந்திரன் உதவியாளர்களிடம் 4 கோடி ரூபாய் பறிமுதல் செய்யப்பட்டது குறித்த புகார் மீது உரிய நடவடிக்கை எடுக்க வேண்டும்
- Madras High Court on Thursday cautioned that it will dismiss the missing person case against Jaggi Vasudev’s Isha Foundation if the petitioner, who moved the Court alleging disappearance of his brother, does not appear in court for hearing.
- S m subramaniyam judge order /District Superintendent of Police. In the event of receiving any complaint regarding illegal mining operations, violation of the Act and the Rules, excess quarry etc., the Commissioner of Geology and Mines, the District Superintendent of Police and the District Collector, are bound to conduct a detailed investigation inquiry under the provisions of the Act and the Rules, and prosecute all persons apart from initiation of disciplinary actions against the officials, who all are responsible and accountable for illegal mining operations. The petitioner is at liberty to submit representations along with all necessary details to the officials. 18. With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 15-04-2024Index : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-Speaking orderNeutral Citation : Yes/NoSvn
More
Recent Posts
- Minister sekar babu pa case full order / mhc/ Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the third respondent is not on election duty and if the third respondent, being a government servant, engages in acts which are not in consonance with the Tamil Nadu Government Servants’ Conduct Rules, 1973, then it is for the employer to take action. He further submits that respondents 1 and 2 would take necessaryaction on the basis of the complaint received from the petitioner.In view of the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of.There shall be no order as to costs.(S.V.G., CJ.) (J.S.N.P., J.)18.04.2024Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NosasiTo:1.The Election Commissioner,Election Commission of India, Nivachan Bhavan, New Delhi.2.The Chief Electoral Officer,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,Chennai-600 009. THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(sasi)
- Tn medium qouta case wp allowed full order of THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
- [18/04, 17:29] Krishna Malai Murasu: திருநெல்வேலி தொகுதி பாஜக வேட்பாளர் நயினார் நாகேந்திரன் உதவியாளர்களிடம் 4 கோடி ரூபாய் பறிமுதல் செய்யப்பட்டது குறித்த புகார் மீது உரிய நடவடிக்கை எடுக்க வேண்டும்
- Madras High Court on Thursday cautioned that it will dismiss the missing person case against Jaggi Vasudev’s Isha Foundation if the petitioner, who moved the Court alleging disappearance of his brother, does not appear in court for hearing.
- S m subramaniyam judge order /District Superintendent of Police. In the event of receiving any complaint regarding illegal mining operations, violation of the Act and the Rules, excess quarry etc., the Commissioner of Geology and Mines, the District Superintendent of Police and the District Collector, are bound to conduct a detailed investigation inquiry under the provisions of the Act and the Rules, and prosecute all persons apart from initiation of disciplinary actions against the officials, who all are responsible and accountable for illegal mining operations. The petitioner is at liberty to submit representations along with all necessary details to the officials. 18. With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 15-04-2024Index : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-Speaking orderNeutral Citation : Yes/NoSvn