Follow:
- Next story Setting aside the Thanjavur collector’s order which rejected an arbitration application on the ground that it was filed outside the prescribed period, the Madras high court held that there is no time limit specified for applying before the arbitrator under the National Highways Act, 1956. Justice S S Sundar observed that even otherwise if the Limitation Act, 1963, was applied in the case, the period prescribed under section 137, which is applicable in the present case, the appeal was filed well before time. “From the facts of the case in hand, this court is satisfied that the appeal had been filed within the prescribed time. Hence, this court has no hesitation to hold that the order passed by the collector dismissing the appeal on the ground of limitation is not only illegal on accounts of the judgements of the earlier division bench of this court, but also by accepting the case of the collector regarding application of Limitation Act,” observed the judge.
- Previous story The Madurai Bench of Madras High Courtheld that registered person making zero rated supply shall be eligible to claim IGSTrefunds, irrespective of the circular on clarifications on exports related refund issues (Circular No.37/2018-Customs, dated 09.10.2018). The ruling was made by a single bench consisting of Justice M.Govindaraj, in the case of M/s.Precot Meridian Limited v. The Commissioner of Customs and Anr.
Recent Posts
- Crl.O.P.Nos.2302 and 4174 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.13952 of 2021 N.ANAND VENKATESH. J., When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) filed the status report of the Assistant Inspector General of Police, Law and Order, Chennai and sought for some more time to complete the enquiry and to file a report pursuant to the orders passed by this Court on 10.12.2021.
- உள்ளாட்சி தேர்தல் தள்ளி வைக்க சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு தான் அதிகாரம் உள்ளது மீண்டும் acj கூறுகிறார்
- Conviction setaside appeal allowed THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.A.(MD)No.374 of 2018
- GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* Vikas Elastochem Agencies Pvt. Ltd. v. The Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise & GST Dated: 03.12.2021. Honourable Justice C. Saravanan* in the matters relating to *“Input Tax Credit – GST Transition – Bona fide Mistake made by Assessee – Rectification”* disposed of the Writ Petition, directing the Department to take an independent decision by deputing a suitable officer from the Department to verify that the
- Sekarreporter 1: Today Tips for Judicial Exam (Magistrate/App): 24-01-2022 The term *Victim* is defined under section 2(wa) Crpc Inserted by way of 2009 Amendment (w.e.f. 31-12-2009). BY, *R.CHANDRASEKARAN*
More
Recent Posts
- Crl.O.P.Nos.2302 and 4174 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.13952 of 2021 N.ANAND VENKATESH. J., When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) filed the status report of the Assistant Inspector General of Police, Law and Order, Chennai and sought for some more time to complete the enquiry and to file a report pursuant to the orders passed by this Court on 10.12.2021.
- உள்ளாட்சி தேர்தல் தள்ளி வைக்க சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு தான் அதிகாரம் உள்ளது மீண்டும் acj கூறுகிறார்
- Conviction setaside appeal allowed THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.A.(MD)No.374 of 2018
- GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* Vikas Elastochem Agencies Pvt. Ltd. v. The Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise & GST Dated: 03.12.2021. Honourable Justice C. Saravanan* in the matters relating to *“Input Tax Credit – GST Transition – Bona fide Mistake made by Assessee – Rectification”* disposed of the Writ Petition, directing the Department to take an independent decision by deputing a suitable officer from the Department to verify that the
- Sekarreporter 1: Today Tips for Judicial Exam (Magistrate/App): 24-01-2022 The term *Victim* is defined under section 2(wa) Crpc Inserted by way of 2009 Amendment (w.e.f. 31-12-2009). BY, *R.CHANDRASEKARAN*
