Follow:
- Next story Setting aside the Thanjavur collector’s order which rejected an arbitration application on the ground that it was filed outside the prescribed period, the Madras high court held that there is no time limit specified for applying before the arbitrator under the National Highways Act, 1956. Justice S S Sundar observed that even otherwise if the Limitation Act, 1963, was applied in the case, the period prescribed under section 137, which is applicable in the present case, the appeal was filed well before time. “From the facts of the case in hand, this court is satisfied that the appeal had been filed within the prescribed time. Hence, this court has no hesitation to hold that the order passed by the collector dismissing the appeal on the ground of limitation is not only illegal on accounts of the judgements of the earlier division bench of this court, but also by accepting the case of the collector regarding application of Limitation Act,” observed the judge.
- Previous story The Madurai Bench of Madras High Courtheld that registered person making zero rated supply shall be eligible to claim IGSTrefunds, irrespective of the circular on clarifications on exports related refund issues (Circular No.37/2018-Customs, dated 09.10.2018). The ruling was made by a single bench consisting of Justice M.Govindaraj, in the case of M/s.Precot Meridian Limited v. The Commissioner of Customs and Anr.
Recent Posts
- These intermediaries say that they have been left out of the recent clarification by the government and that they will continue their legal battle across high courts. The main
- Why Madras HC’s Ruling on Digital Intermediaries Is SignificantThe order assumes importance by highlighting one of the primary tests which could be used to reveal the unconstitutionality of the rules under Part II.24 hours ago | Smitha Krishna Prasad and Madhavi
- bench of Chief Justice of India NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant observed that it is not expected to act mechanically merely to deliver a purported dispute raised by an applicant at the doors of the chosen Arbitrator.
- Section 34 of the Arbitration Act stipulates that any person aggrieved by an arbitral award can file an application seeking setting aside of the arbitral award in terms of Sections
- Justice SM Subramaniam observed, ” Fraudulent and illegal encroachments of temple properties is a crime against the society at large. Misappropriation of the funds of the temple is
More
Recent Posts
- These intermediaries say that they have been left out of the recent clarification by the government and that they will continue their legal battle across high courts. The main
- Why Madras HC’s Ruling on Digital Intermediaries Is SignificantThe order assumes importance by highlighting one of the primary tests which could be used to reveal the unconstitutionality of the rules under Part II.24 hours ago | Smitha Krishna Prasad and Madhavi
- bench of Chief Justice of India NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant observed that it is not expected to act mechanically merely to deliver a purported dispute raised by an applicant at the doors of the chosen Arbitrator.
- Section 34 of the Arbitration Act stipulates that any person aggrieved by an arbitral award can file an application seeking setting aside of the arbitral award in terms of Sections
- Justice SM Subramaniam observed, ” Fraudulent and illegal encroachments of temple properties is a crime against the society at large. Misappropriation of the funds of the temple is
