SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA     C.R.P.Nos.587 & 1937 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.3065 and 3343 of 2022  C.R.P.No.587 of 2022  M/s.Primex Healthcare and Research Pvt. Ltd.,  Rep by its Director,       In any case, the learned Rent Controller need not have rejected the petition, since the rent agreement is a written one and is still in force. Instead, the petition could have been returned to comply the registration formalities under Rule 4 of the New Rent Rules and represent it after compliance. Since the agreement period is going to expire shortly, if the landlord complies the registration formalities of the Act, he can get a green signal for eviction under Section  5(1) also”  Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.         For Petitioner         :    Mr.Anirudh Krishnan  For Respondent      :    Mr.M.L.Ganesh  In C.R.P.No.1937 of 2022                  For Petitioner         :    Mr.M.Sunil Kumar     C  O M M O N   O R D E R

THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA C.R.P.Nos.587 & 1937 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.3065 and 3343 of 2022 C.R.P.No.587 of 2022 M/s.Primex Healthcare and Research Pvt. Ltd., Rep by its Director, In any case, the learned Rent Controller need not have rejected the petition, since the rent agreement is a written one and is still in force. Instead, the petition could have been returned to comply the registration formalities under Rule 4 of the New Rent Rules and represent it after compliance. Since the agreement period is going to expire shortly, if the landlord complies the registration formalities of the Act, he can get a green signal for eviction under Section 5(1) also” Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. For Petitioner : Mr.Anirudh Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.M.L.Ganesh In C.R.P.No.1937 of 2022 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sunil Kumar C O M M O N O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS C.R.P.No.587 of 2022 Reserved on 15.06.2022 C.R.P.No.1937 of 2022 Reserved on 24.06.2022 Pronounced on  29.09.2022   CORAM:   THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA   C.R.P.Nos.587 & 1937...

Rule 37 amendment – Implications for taxpayers OCTOBER 07, 2022 By K Aarthy, Advocate, G N Law Associates IN GST regime, the credit of input taxes charged on any supply of goods and services or both can be availed by the taxpayers subject to conditions prescribed in Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017

  Rule 37 amendment – Implications for taxpayers OCTOBER 07, 2022 By K Aarthy, Advocate, G N Law Associates IN GST regime, the credit of input taxes charged on any supply of goods and...

Mhc orders oct 6

Mhc orders oct 6

[10/6, 12:27] Sekarreporter1: மும்பை வங்கிக் கணக்கில் டிபாசிட் செய்யப்பட்டிருந்த 40 கோடி ரூபாயை விடுதலைப்புலிகள் அமைப்புக்காக, மோசடி செய்து எடுக்க முயன்றதாக பதிவு செய்யப்பட்ட வழக்கில் கைது செய்யப்பட்டவர்களுக்கு சட்டப்பூர்வ ஜாமீன் வழங்க மறுத்து சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. இந்தியன் ஓவர்சீஸ் வங்கியின் மும்பை...

worshipping of a god cannot be stopped by closing of the temple due to the dispute between the two rival groups.   THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU  P(MD)No.23296 of 2022and  W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17384 and 17385 of 2022  K.Seeni Thevar      For Petitioner         :  Mr.C.Selvaraj                    For R1, R2 & R4 : Mr.D.Gandhiraj,  Special Government Pleader                           For R3   : Mr.S.Manohar  O R D E R  

worshipping of a god cannot be stopped by closing of the temple due to the dispute between the two rival groups. THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU P(MD)No.23296 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17384 and 17385 of 2022 K.Seeni Thevar      For Petitioner         :  Mr.C.Selvaraj                   For R1, R2 & R4 : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader                          For R3   : Mr.S.Manohar O R D E R  

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.10.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU P(MD)No.23296 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17384 and 17385 of 2022 K.Seeni Thevar                               … Petitioner Vs 1.The Joint Commissioner,   ...

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI  CRL OP(MD). No.17679 of 2021  Umamaheswari                 … Petitioner/Defacto Complainant                            Vs.

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL OP(MD). No.17679 of 2021 Umamaheswari                 … Petitioner/Defacto Complainant                            Vs.

  BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Reserved on  : 14/09/2022 Delivered on :19/09/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL OP(MD). No.17679 of 2021 Umamaheswari                 … Petitioner/Defacto...

Draft Inputs for State Education Policy.     State Commission for Education  In order to continuously monitor and implement the multiple programmes at various layers, upgrade, update and review them, the Tamil Nadu State Commission for Education can be statutorily constituted, which can continue despite the change of the Government at any point of time.            Given to D Murugesan judge  by cathalic  kalagam  

Draft Inputs for State Education Policy. State Commission for Education In order to continuously monitor and implement the multiple programmes at various layers, upgrade, update and review them, the Tamil Nadu State Commission for Education can be statutorily constituted, which can continue despite the change of the Government at any point of time.           Given to D Murugesan judge by cathalic kalagam  

Draft Inputs for State Education Policy Index No. Content P.No.   General Introduction 3   1. School Education 1.1. Introduction 6 1.2. Guiding Principles 7 1.3. Policy Proposals 1.3.1. Access 8 1.3.2. Inclusion 9...

Therefore the students should be allowed to write examinations only after completing 10 months of the course. Therefore, the University is advised to formulate a system that the students are completing at least 10 months course and thereafter attempt to write the examinations. Further the University is advised to issue certificate clarifying the during of course while issuing the course completion certificate.  With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed.       THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY  (MD)No.17633 of 2017and  W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14185 to 14187 of 2017  M.Senbagam                              …  Petitioner  -Vs-  1.The Teacher Recruitment Board,  .   For Petitioner           : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam  For Respondents    : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan (for R1)     Mr.V.OMprakash (for R2 & R3)     Government Advocate (Civil Side)     Mr.K.Ragatheeshkumar (for R4)    for M/S.Isaac Chamber   ORDER

Therefore the students should be allowed to write examinations only after completing 10 months of the course. Therefore, the University is advised to formulate a system that the students are completing at least 10 months course and thereafter attempt to write the examinations. Further the University is advised to issue certificate clarifying the during of course while issuing the course completion certificate. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD)No.17633 of 2017and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14185 to 14187 of 2017 M.Senbagam                              …  Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Teacher Recruitment Board, . For Petitioner           : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam For Respondents    : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan (for R1)    Mr.V.OMprakash (for R2 & R3)    Government Advocate (Civil Side)    Mr.K.Ragatheeshkumar (for R4)    for M/S.Isaac Chamber   ORDER

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT        DATED:16.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD)No.17633 of 2017and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14185 to 14187 of 2017 M.Senbagam                              …  Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Teacher Recruitment Board, Rep. by...

Sekarreporter1: A difference of opinion has occurred in the powerful Supreme Court collegium over the correct procedure to recommend four names, one of them a senior advocate, to the apex court Bench after months of presenting a unified front which saw many firsts in judicial appointments to the constitutional courts.

Sekarreporter1: A difference of opinion has occurred in the powerful Supreme Court collegium over the correct procedure to recommend four names, one of them a senior advocate, to the apex court Bench after months of presenting a unified front which saw many firsts in judicial appointments to the constitutional courts.

[10/6, 07:01] Sekarreporter1: A difference of opinion has occurred in the powerful Supreme Court collegium over the correct procedure to recommend four names, one of them a senior advocate, to the apex court Bench...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Call Now ButtonCALL ME